Need someone to look at a regression

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < vyz1zqjhmgj.fsf@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de >you write:
  > I can't check it out currently, but egcs-1.1 is correct if it warns about
  > implicit int.  Use `typedef int SFtype __attribute__ ((mode (SF)))'
  > instead.
I think the warning is wrong.  Given:

   typedef SFtype __attribute__ ((mode (SF)));

We have an explicit type (SFmode), why in the hell would we ever
want/need typedef int ....?

eff