patch to supress trailing missing initializer warnings

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 199808060143.DAA03028@jolan.ppro >you write:
  > I think that the situations in which you want a warning
  > but wouldn't get one with case A (X) is much larger then
  > the cases in which case B will give a warning while you
  > don't really care much about a warning (Y) (Apart from
  > the fact that it is better to give too much warnings in
  > this case then too less).
  > 
  > This shows that case B is *better*.
  > 
  > Fuzzy ok, but still better.
Sorry.  Fuzzy is not better in this case.  In fact, in general fuzzy is not
better for egcs.
jeff