To -g or not to -g? (was: egcs build report)

[Gerald Pfeifer]

On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>> (For 1.1 itself we could include a note on how to build without
>> debug symbols, but still have debuggable libraries, but not change
>> the code).
> Agreed.

Okay, but who'll do that?  I'd really like to see that, but how exactly
can this -- binaries without debug symbols and libraries with debugging
information -- be done?

If anyone knows but doesn't want to update the docs, please give me a
hint and I'll do the HTML stuff...

Gerald
-- 
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry)      Vienna University of Technology
pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at   http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/