typedef vs. typename confusion

[Jason Merrill]

>>>>> Noel Yap <nyap@garban.com> writes:

> Joe Buck wrote:
>> Rigorous enforcement of the "typename" rule will break a lot of old code.

> If this is so, then a compiler switch should be provided to emulate the
> older behaviour.  The default should anally conform to the standard.

If you want an anal-retentive compiler, feel free to use -pedantic, don't
try to impose it on others.

Jason