Not successfully built ecgs
Toon Moene
toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl
Tue Aug 4 12:19:00 GMT 1998
> I am sorry for confusing you ... it is i386 assembler.
> I was trapped by the word 'nextstep' in the Host/Target
> specific installation notes and didn't realize the 'm68k-'
> prefix.
My own fault, I should have read the whole message instead of
jumping to the end immediately.
> ~/Developer/egcs-1.0.3a/objdir/gcc> cat dummy.s
> / GNU C version egcs-2.90.29 980515 (egcs-1.0.3 release)
> (i386-next-nextstep3) compiled by GNU C version 2.5.8.
[deleted]
Yep, I had problems with dummy.c before, but they were definitely
preprocessor problems and not assembler problems - so your's are
different !
OTOH, I do not know whether upgrading the assembler will help. The
GNU assembler is part of the binutils package, and *I* cannot
upgrade binutils on my NEXTSTEP system, because the package doesn't
support the Mach-O object format (try to do a file <something>.o on
a correctly compiled object file - if it says: Mach-O format, you're
lost).
OTTH, egcs-1.0.3 & egcs-1.1-prerelease _do_ generate correct
assembler on my m68k system, so the question is: Do you really need
a new assembler ? Unfortunately, I do not have access to an
i386-next-nextstep3 system to find out ...
HTH,
Toon.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list