Inconsistance in snapshots repository
Gerald Pfeifer
pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at
Thu Apr 23 13:31:00 GMT 1998
On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>> On another related note: What happended to the idea of bumping the date
>> more regularily, e.g., daily?
> No time. Like most things a contribution of code would greatly
> speed up the process.
I'm not sure whether the following is what you have asked for, but...
Here we go:
-------- cut here --------
#!/bin/sh
cvs update version.c
CURR_DATE=`date +"%Y%m%d"`
OLD_VERSION=`cat version.c`
sed -e "s/\(.*egcs-[^ ]*\) [^ ]*/\1 ${CURR_DATE}/" >version.c <<HERE
$OLD_VERSION
HERE
cvs commit -m "Daily bump." version.c
-------- cut here --------
Is that useable for you?
>> And on a final related note, I suggest to use 19980404 instead of 980404,
>> unless egcs won't be Y2000-compliant! <g>
> Probably a good idea [...]
Indeed I noticed that the latest snapshot now carries a 4-digit year, so
none can complain about my script introducing this... ;-)
Gerald
--
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) Vienna University of Technology
pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/
More information about the Gcc
mailing list