HOST_WIDE_INT = long long patch

[John Carr]

> I checked in a fix to synth_mult for multiplying by -1 on Apr 3.  In
> theory your patch shouldn't be necessary anymore.  Can you please
> double check?

That didn't fix the problem for me.  It turned out that my fix worked
because it masked a different error: certain operations were
incorrectly being assigned cost 0.  Use this patch instead.

Tue Apr  7 19:25:27 1998  John Carr  <jfc@mit.edu>

	* expmed.c (init_expmed): Initialize entire cost array when
	MAX_BITS_PER_WORD > BITS_PER_WORD.

diff -c -3 -p -r1.11 expmed.c
*** expmed.c	1998/04/04 17:37:49	1.11
--- expmed.c	1998/04/07 23:24:37
*************** init_expmed ()
*** 120,126 ****
    shift_cost[0] = 0;
    shiftadd_cost[0] = shiftsub_cost[0] = add_cost;
  
!   for (m = 1; m < BITS_PER_WORD; m++)
      {
        shift_cost[m] = shiftadd_cost[m] = shiftsub_cost[m] = 32000;
  
--- 120,126 ----
    shift_cost[0] = 0;
    shiftadd_cost[0] = shiftsub_cost[0] = add_cost;
  
!   for (m = 1; m < MAX_BITS_PER_WORD; m++)
      {
        shift_cost[m] = shiftadd_cost[m] = shiftsub_cost[m] = 32000;