A new alpha bug
Jason Merrill
jason@cygnus.com
Tue Sep 16 10:38:00 GMT 1997
>>>>> H J Lu <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> I have seen places with
> TREE_ADDRESSABLE (init) = 1;
> DECL_RTL (init) = return_target;
> or something like it. Should they be replaces by
> DECL_RTL (init) = return_target;
> TREE_ADDRESSABLE (init) = 0;
> mark_addressable (init);
If you're referring to the code in cplus_expand_expr, no. That decl is
a wrapper around specific RTL, not a real variable.
Jason
More information about the Gcc
mailing list