A new alpha bug

[Jason Merrill]

>>>>> H J Lu <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

>> >   complex_double (double r = 0, double i = 0): re (r), im (i) { }
>> [...]
>> >   complex_double one = 1.0;
>> 
>> I don't think this does what you think it does.  What it doesn't
>> do is call the constructor listed. 

Yes, it does.

> complex_double one = 1.0;

> should be translate by compiler to

> complex_double one;
> complex_double tmp (1.0);
> one = tmp;

Not quite.  More like

complex_double tmp (1.0, 0);
complex_double one (tmp);

The '=' in a declaration does not indicate use of the assignment operator.

Jason