question regarding asm()

[Christian Iseli]

> You should rather use an extra hard register number for the frame pointer,
> and then eliminate this frame pointer either to the hard frame pointer or
> to the stack.
         ^^^^^
(I guess you mean the stack pointer...)

Hmm...  That's what I'm doing already.  reload, at least with Bernd's
patch applied, puts the HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNO in the bad_spill_regs,
even when frame_pointer_needed is 0.  That's what I patched...

					Christian