egcs-971016: results on i586-linux-gnulibc1 haifa disabled - a mystery?!

Sat Oct 18 11:16:00 GMT 1997

Hi,

I'm reporting results of  stock egcs-971016 with the following patches
applied:

  [1]: REALLY_SET_LIB_PATH: patch by myself - but rejected by
       Jeffrey A Law.
  [2]: PICFLAG: patch by myself - still not yet sent in - delayed
       by management training :-).
  [3]: bootstrap simplifications: patch by myself - sent to Jeff
       for egcs-970929.
  [4]: gxx_include_dir: patch by myself for `using the same value
       between the different parts of egcs' - will sent it soon.
  [5]: `Skip linked once FDE entries': patch by H.J. Lu.
  [6]: GCC_BASE_CFLAGS: patch by H.J. Lu.
  [7]: ASM_BYTE_OP/ASM_OUTPUT_ASCII: patch by myself - sent to
       Jeff for egcs-970929.
  [8]: gnucompare{,3}: patch by myself - will sent it soon.
  [9]: Install c++filt: patch by myself - sent to Jeff for egcs-970929.
 [10]: `Inhibit deferred pop...': patch by H.J. Lu.
 [11]: `Missing #pragma interface/implementation': patch by
       Alexandre Oliva.
 [12]: `Re: (971016) i386-linux-gnulibc1 g++ check results': latest libio
       patch from H.J. Lu.
 [13]: Missing SHELL: patch by myself - sent to Jeff for egcs-970929.
 [14]: delta.mt: patch by myself for a m68k-motorola-sysv - will
       sent it soon.

The first time I ran the checks I was using:

    binutils-2.8.1.0.15
    libc-5.4.33		(official version from Debian 1.3.1)
    pre-patch-2.0.31-10.gz

and  got 39  unexpected g++   failures;  interestingly, much more   EH
failures, than Mumit Khan reported recently.

OK, so far so good, then I disabled patches

    [1], [5], [6], [10], [11], [12]

removed the builddir,  built  and checked everything  again. Surprise,
*nothing* changed.

In the meantime I upgraded my libc to 5.4.39 (not that easy with these
`packaged systems' like Debian if there is no official upgrade package
from the vendor - if someone wants to have my hacked debian/* files to
build the appropriate .deb files himself send  me an e-mail), removed,
re-built and checked everything once again.

Result,   *nothing*  changed.

I would be  pleased, if those who  are  getting other results  than me
will tell me

    - which patches are you using
    - what is your system configuration (binutils, libc, Linux
      kernel, ...)

Here are my results:

Test Run By manfred on Sat Oct 18 19:12:34 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1

		=== libio Summary ===

# of expected passes		40

Test Run By manfred on Sat Oct 18 19:13:44 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1

		=== libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		30

Test Run By manfred on Sat Oct 18 19:14:52 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1

		=== gcc tests ===

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c,  -O0  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c,  -O1  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c,  -O2  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions  

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		4883
# of unexpected failures	4
# of expected failures		4
# of unsupported tests		7
/home/manfred/work/GNU/egcs-971016-i586-linux-gnulibc1/gcc/xgcc version egcs-2.90.13 971016 (gcc2-970802 experimental)

Test Run By manfred on Sat Oct 18 19:32:57 1997
Native configuration is i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1

		=== g++ tests ===

FAIL: g++.benjamin/warn01.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.jason/template31.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/eh10.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh12.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh14.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh16.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh17.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh18.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh2.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh21.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh24.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh25.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh26.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh27.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh28.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh29.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh3.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh31.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh33.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh34.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh35.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh36.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh37.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh38.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh39.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh40.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh41.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh42.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh44.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh47.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh48.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh49.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh5.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh50.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh51.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh6.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh8.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/p7912.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/p9706.C  Execution test

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		3342
# of unexpected failures	39
# of unexpected successes	1
# of expected failures		81
# of untested testcases		6
/home/manfred/work/GNU/egcs-971016-i586-linux-gnulibc1/gcc/testsuite/../xgcc version egcs-2.90.13 971016 (gcc2-970802 experimental)

config flags:	--enable-shared=yes
BOOT_CFLAGS:	-O6 -mpentium

Cherio
-- 
 Manfred Hollstein       If you have any questions about GNU software:
 Hindenburgstr. 13/1                   < mailto:manfred@s-direktnet.de >
 75446 Wiernsheim, FRG  < http://www.s-direktnet.de/HomePages/manfred/ >
 PGP key:    < http://www.s-direktnet.de/HomePages/manfred/manfred.asc >