question regarding asm()

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < Pine.SOL.3.90.971017101906.7483B-100000@hutch.informatik.rwth-aachen.de >you write:
  > I'd like to mention here that the reload patch I posted here a few months
  > ago does not only cause better code to be generated on the x86, it should also
  > solve these problems by taking hard register lifetimes into account and only
  > using free hard regs for reloads.
I think that patch is worth looking at, but right now the priority is issues
for the release.  Your improvement to reload_cse is also near the top of my
list once we get the release out.

jeff