exception handling poll
Joern Rennecke
amylaar@cygnus.co.uk
Thu Oct 16 15:19:00 GMT 1997
> So. Given the number I posted last night at 12.5%, a patch I put
> together this evening that yields about 11% on x86, a rock-bottom
> minimum somewhere between 4.5 and 6% (depending on other constraints)
> and the fact that the sparc port is already down at 5.4%:
>
> Is it worth spending the effort required to get that last 5%,
> possibly by requiring a new version of gnu ld? Or would I just
> be wasting my time since the overhead would still be considered
> unacceptible?
Why don't you implement first a scheme that makes the linker strip all EH
info if there is no user of EH info? That looks like a greater saving to
me.
Of course, a low-overhead EH scheme is still important if you need EH
info in shared libraries.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list