egcs-971008: results on i586-linux-gnulibc1 haifa disabled

[Manfred Hollstein]

On Sat, 11 October 1997, 13:36:09, hjl@lucon.org wrote:

    > 
    > Stock egcs-971008 with the following patches applied:
    > 
    >   [8]: fix for tstring.cc from H.J. Lu.
    
    This patch is not necessary.
    
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh10.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh16.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh17.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh2.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh23.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh25.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh29.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh3.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh33.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh35.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh39.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh40.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh41.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh42.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh44.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh5.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh50.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh51.C  Execution test
    > FAIL: g++.mike/eh6.C  Execution test
    
    I don't have so many EH failures. But I have this patch installed.
    
    
    H.J.
    ---
    Thu Oct  2 12:41:44 1997  H.J. Lu  (hjl@gnu.ai.mit.edu)
    
    	* except.c (expand_exception_blocks): Inhibit deferred pop
    	in the exception handler.
    
    [patch deleted]

Thanks, just tried  it, but it   doesn't make any  difference; numbers
remain the same:

                === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            3356
# of unexpected failures        24
# of expected failures          80
# of untested testcases         6

You must be using another patch that makes the difference.

-- 
 Manfred Hollstein       If you have any questions about GNU software:
 Hindenburgstr. 13/1                   < mailto:manfred@s-direktnet.de >
 75446 Wiernsheim, FRG  < http://www.s-direktnet.de/HomePages/manfred/ >
 PGP key:    < http://www.s-direktnet.de/HomePages/manfred/manfred.asc >