linux-2.1.60/i586,glibc-2.0.5c,egcs-971114 snapshot :)
teunis
teunis@mauve.computersupportcentre.com
Wed Nov 19 08:46:00 GMT 1997
On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> In message < Pine.LNX.3.96.971117143148.2661A-100000@sigil.computersupportcentre.com >you write:
> > binutils-latest + support for additional wanted platforms (eg. Win32 :)
> > libraries? I don't know where to obtain them.
> > Same for simulator.... (why a simulator?)
> Well, for many you can use the latest newlib release.
???? newlib release ????
> You'd want a instruction set simulator so that you can run the "execution"
> tests -- particularly useful if you don't have a target board, or it has
> a terribly slow (less than ethernet) speed link.
To be quite honest:
I don't have immediate access to some of the hardware.....
... and there's no Win32 emulator available... that works.
So how do I build a cross-compiler?
> > I also get random "exception 11"s - where I didn't used to with previous
> > compilers. [they're quite consistent actually - but I haven't yet tracked
> > down what's causing them]
> You might want to look at the g77 info files for "Signal 11 and Friends". This
> might be a hardware failure.
No - this is definitely egcs-971114
(ref someone else's post about linux source causing this)
gcc-2.7.2.1 - works perfectly on all files
egcs-2.90.10p (pentium-gcc mods) - works perfectly... most of the time...
(older egcs - some bugs present then)
egcs-2.90.16 - some problems, nothing serious.
my test code is ~3M of VR/math-related work. VERY cpu-intensive (and
memory-intensive) to compile. Makes an excellent test of optimizations
too - for instance: pgcc's output code is 30-50% faster than gcc-2.7.2.1's
output code with this project.
... egcs (plus other changes to the computer) have slowed it down - so
egcs is not yet as efficient for i586 as pentium-gcc.
G'day, eh? :)
- Teunis
More information about the Gcc
mailing list