1008 segfaults in genattr

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 19971119013203.31835@dgii.com >you write:
  > Do they actively *want* to disable this, or is there some habit or
  > intertia involved?
Yup, it looks like it was done on purpose, for reasons I don't really want
to understand this late at night :(

  > acs, what is the exact triple generated by 'config.guess' for your
  > target?
I was going to ask the same question...  It's definitely not something
with "unixware" in the name :-)

  > Do we really want to try to make it *just* unixware here, or all
  > x86 SVR4 mutants?
Well, I was going to do it for whatever triplet popped up for unixware;
this may or may not suck in some of the other variants.

  > Yes, doing it this way you do risk  [ breaking | fixing ] other ports.
Yup.  We're in a bad position, but since most ports don't seem to have the
kind of trouble with this as unixware, the safest thing to do seems to be
to fix things for unixware now and try to find a sane solution for everything
later.

Also note, we _may_ end up having do disable .fini for x86-solaris due to bugs
in the solaris2.5 libraries...  Oh what fun...

jeff