971105/Red Hat 4.2/intel results
Joe Buck
jbuck@synopsys.com
Fri Nov 7 21:25:00 GMT 1997
Here are the results I get using Red Hat 4.2 plus the gas from
binutils 2.8.1.0.15. If I also use the ld from the same binutils
versions, all the gcc failures go away (the problem with "int glob;"
vanishes).
Summary of tests for i586-pc-linux-gnulibc1
Red Hat 4.2 +
GNU assembler version 970731, using BFD version linux-2.8.1.0.15
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fin
line-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fin
line-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960218-1.c execution, -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fin
line-functions -funroll-all-loops
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 4877
# of unexpected failures 6
# of expected failures 5
# of unsupported tests 7
(As I said, with the newer ld all the above failures go away).
=== g++ tests ===
FAIL: g++.benjamin/warn01.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/destruct3.C - (test for bogus messages, line 38)
FAIL: g++.jason/template31.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.mike/dyncast2.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh23.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3378
# of unexpected failures 3
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 79
# of untested testcases 6
All g77, libio, and libstdc++ tests pass.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list