On Mon, Dec 29, 1997 at 11:20:46AM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > Well, on the x86, I don't see how you can get @PLT without a > function name -- unless the compiler mis-compiled itself or we have > a SYMBOL_REF with a null name. It does seem pretty far-fetched, doesn't it? We should keep a lookout for possible libc bugs as well. r~