local_prefix a mistake
J. Kean Johnston
jkj@sco.com
Mon Dec 15 09:38:00 GMT 1997
On Mon, Dec 15, 1997 at 11:37:48AM +0000, Andrew Fitzgibbon wrote:
> It's a problem with local_prefix, which ought to be removed. It's
> undeniably useful, but the user should explicitly specify any -I flags
> other than for /usr/include.
Not when the compiler is installed in /usr/local it shouldn't. The current
behaviour is correct and desirable. /usr/local is traditionally for add-on
stuff. You added on a vital VITAL development tool, your compiler. Why
would one assume if you are brave enough to use a replacement compiler
that you dont want to use replacement and addon libraries too?
If you REALLY wanna get around this, configure your egcs with --prefix=/usr
so that everything gets installed in /usr/bin, /usr/include etc. *THAT* is
when adding -I/usr/local/include would be The Wrong Thing.
Kean.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list