on egcs-1.0

[Jeffrey A Law]

  In message < 199712072306.AAA18675@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de >you write:
  > The original wording using 'incompatible' was somewhat confusing.
Yup.

  > What it (probably?) meant is: The next snapshot will include a patch
  > relative to 1201, not to 1.0. So if you apply the 1.0 patch now, you
  > will not be able to patch to the next snapshot, unless you reconstruct
  > the 1201 sources first.
That is the case.  I've mentioned it several times to this list.

jeff