next glibc showstopper
Bernd Schmidt
crux@ohara.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE
Wed Dec 3 05:46:00 GMT 1997
> This indeed should have been done in i386.[ch].
>
> Can you show me the exact RTL so we can figure out where it should
> be changed?
I've figured it out. It turned out to be caused by a piece of code from
Intel's pentium patches that shouldn't have gotten in there. Removing this
code fixes the problem.
Bernd
* i386.c (notice_update_cc): Remove bogus pentium GCC code.
*** ./config/i386/i386.c.orig-1 Tue Dec 2 20:08:51 1997
--- ./config/i386/i386.c Tue Dec 2 20:12:18 1997
*************** notice_update_cc (exp)
*** 3542,3556 ****
if (SET_DEST (exp) == pc_rtx)
return;
- #ifdef IS_STACK_MODE
- /* Moving into a memory of stack_mode may have been moved
- in between the use and set of cc0 by loop_spl(). So
- old value of cc.status must be retained */
- if (GET_CODE(SET_DEST(exp)) == MEM
- && IS_STACK_MODE (GET_MODE (SET_DEST (exp))))
- return;
- #endif
-
/* Moving register or memory into a register:
it doesn't alter the cc's, but it might invalidate
the RTX's which we remember the cc's came from.
--- 3542,3547 ----
More information about the Gcc
mailing list