Results for 4.0.0 20040920 (experimental) testsuite on i686-suse9-linux-gnu

Manfred Hollstein manfred.hollstein@novell.com
Mon Sep 20 19:59:00 GMT 2004 

Compiler version: 4.0.0 20040920 (experimental) 
Platform:	  i686-suse9-linux-gnu

Sources:	  HEAD as of 2004/09/20 14:37:21 +0200
LAST_UPDATED:	  Mon Sep 20 12:37:21 UTC 2004
Patches:	  None
Environment:	  - binutils-2.15 (FSF release)
		  - dejagnu-1.4.4-0.mh.0
		  - expect-5.40-27
		  - SUSE LINUX 9.1 + recommended updates as of today
		  - Linux version 2.6.5-7.108-smp (geeko@buildhost) (gcc version 3.3.3 (SuSE Linux)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 25 13:34:40 UTC 2004
		  - glibc-2.3.3-97

Remarks:	  This time the libstdc++ results are back to normal (compare with the
		  other results I posted earlier today
		  <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-09/msg00870.html>); the
		  only item changed is the bootstrap compiler, ie. I had a gcc-4.0.0
		  installed this time...
		  It appears that the testsuite is still not 100% clean to set things
		  up so that the built libraries etc. are used during "make check".


configure flags:  --host=i686-suse9-linux-gnu --target=i686-suse9-linux-gnu --build=i686-suse9-linux-gnu --srcdir=../gcc-20040920 --prefix=/opt/gnu --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-checking --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-interpreter --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --with-system-zlib --with-local-prefix=/opt/gnu --with-cpu=pentium4 --enable-nls --verbose --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,f95,java,objc
BOOT_CC:	  gcc version 4.0.0 20040920 (experimental)
BOOT_CFLAGS:      -O2 -g
CFLAGS:           -O2 -g
CXXFLAGS:         -O2 -g
GCJFLAGS:         -O2 -g


Native configuration is i686-suse9-linux-gnu

		=== acats tests ===

FAIL:	c330001
FAIL:	c380004
FAIL:	c43204e
FAIL:	c43214c
FAIL:	c45273a
FAIL:	c45347a
FAIL:	c45347b
FAIL:	c45347c
FAIL:	c74004a
FAIL:	c95072a
FAIL:	c95072b
FAIL:	c954026
FAIL:	ca11005
FAIL:	cc1221d
FAIL:	cc3224a
FAIL:	cd10002
FAIL:	cd2a31a
FAIL:	cxaa010
FAIL:	cxaa017
FAIL:	cxb4004

		=== acats Summary ===

# of expected passes		2302
# of unexpected failures	20

		=== g++ tests ===

Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler _ZTIP9CTemplateIhE:
XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler-not .globl[ \\t]+_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE
XPASS: g++.dg/rtti/tinfo1.C scan-assembler-not .section[^\\n\\r]*_ZTIP9CTemplateIhE[^\\n\\r]*
FAIL: 102:is -:should be 1
FAIL: g++.dg/gcov/gcov-1.C gcov: 1 failures in line counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p10769a.C compilation failed to produce executable
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.other/enum5.C compilation failed to produce executable
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
WARNING: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/friend44.C compilation failed to produce executable

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		10159
# of unexpected failures	2
# of unexpected successes	4
# of expected failures		78
# of unsupported tests		49
/home/gnu/work/GNU/gcc-20040920-i686-suse9-linux-gnu/gcc/testsuite/../g++  version 4.0.0 20040920 (experimental)

		=== gcc tests ===

Running target unix
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2e.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t026 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute 
FAIL: tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1/t028 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute 
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-die7.c scan-assembler 1.*DW_AT_inline
FAIL: gcc.dg/20040813-1.c scan-assembler .stabs*100,0,2
FAIL: gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-3.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-3.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ifc-20040816-2.c scan-tree-dump-times Applying if-conversion 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-2.c scan-tree-dump-times arr_base.*= 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c scan-tree-dump-times arr_base.*= 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-74.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-79.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-80.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c compilation,  -O1  -ftree-based-profiling -fbranch-probabilities
UNRESOLVED: gcc.misc-tests/bprob-1.c execution,    -O1  -ftree-based-profiling -fbranch-probabilities
FAIL: 96:is -:should be 1
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-4.c gcov: 1 failures in line counts, 0 in branch percentages, 0 in return percentages

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		30859
# of unexpected failures	15
# of unexpected successes	1
# of expected failures		113
# of unresolved testcases	1
# of untested testcases		28
# of unsupported tests		270
/home/gnu/work/GNU/gcc-20040920-i686-suse9-linux-gnu/gcc/xgcc  version 4.0.0 20040920 (experimental)

		=== gfortran tests ===

Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O0  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O1  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O2  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -O3 -g  execution test
XPASS: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_1.f90  -Os  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/contained_3.f90 compilation,  -O2 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/contained_3.f90 compilation,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/contained_3.f90 compilation,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/contained_3.f90 compilation,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/contained_3.f90 compilation,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/contained_3.f90 compilation,  -Os 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/elemental.f90 execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/elemental.f90 execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/forall_3.f90 execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/st_function.f90 compilation,  -O2 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/st_function.f90 compilation,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/st_function.f90 compilation,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/st_function.f90 compilation,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/st_function.f90 compilation,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/st_function.f90 compilation,  -Os 

		=== gfortran Summary ===

# of expected passes		4409
# of unexpected failures	15
# of unexpected successes	8
# of expected failures		27
# of untested testcases		12
/home/gnu/work/GNU/gcc-20040920-i686-suse9-linux-gnu/gcc/testsuite/../gfortran  version 4.0.0 20040920 (experimental)

		=== objc tests ===

Running target unix

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		1421
# of unsupported tests		7
/home/gnu/work/GNU/gcc-20040920-i686-suse9-linux-gnu/gcc/xgcc  version 4.0.0 20040920 (experimental)

		=== libffi tests ===

Running target unix

		=== libffi Summary ===

# of expected passes		212
# of unsupported tests		2

		=== libjava tests ===

Running target unix
FAIL: pr83 -O3 compilation from bytecode

		=== libjava Summary ===

# of expected passes		3570
# of unexpected failures	1
# of expected failures		14
# of untested testcases		18

		=== libmudflap tests ===

Running target unix
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c (-O2) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c (-O2) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c (-O3) execution test
FAIL: libmudflap.cth/pass40-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test

		=== libmudflap Summary ===

# of expected passes		1162
# of unexpected failures	6

		=== libstdc++-v3 check-abi Summary ===

# of added symbols:		 37
# of missing symbols:		 0
# of incompatible symbols:	 11

using: /home/gnu/work/GNU/gcc-20040920/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/i486-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt

		=== libstdc++ tests ===

Running target unix
XPASS: 22_locale/locale/cons/12658_thread-1.cc execution test
XPASS: 26_numerics/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)

		=== libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		2899
# of unexpected successes	2
# of expected failures		5


Counting all warnings,
there are 20 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
      5 gcc/config/i386/i386.md
      3 insn-conditions.c
      3 gengtype-lex.c
      3 gcc/gcc.c
      2 gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
      1 gcc/libgcc2.c
      1 gcc/java/jvspec.c
      1 gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
      1 gcc/ada/tracebak.c

Number of warning types:
      4 source missing a mode?
      3 old-style function definition
      1 string length '844' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      1 string length '819' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      1 string length '783' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      1 string length '695' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      1 string length '608' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      1 string length '603' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      1 string length '597' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      1 string length '534' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      1 string length '533' is greater than the length '509' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of '__udivmoddi4' differ in signedness
      1 passing arg ??? of 'add_sym_1' from incompatible pointer type
      1 operand 1 missing mode?
      1 comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false

More information about the Gcc-testresults mailing list