Results for 3.4 20030328 (experimental) testsuite on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7

[Michael Ritzert]

LAST_UPDATED: Fri Mar 28 07:43:58 GMT 2003

Native configuration is i386-unknown-freebsd4.7

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: pch/system-1.C -g assembly comparison
FAIL: pch/system-1.C -O2 -g assembly comparison

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		8448
# of unexpected failures	2
# of expected failures		69
# of untested testcases		12
# of unsupported tests		3
/usr/home/ritzert/gcc-HEAD/obj/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.4 20030328 (experimental)

		=== g77 tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/980520-1.f compilation,  -O0 

		=== g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes		1678
# of unexpected failures	1
# of untested testcases		1
# of unsupported tests		8
/usr/home/ritzert/gcc-HEAD/obj/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.4 20030328 (experimental)

		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-6.c compilation,  -O0 
UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-6.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-6.c compilation,  -O0 
UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-6.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.dg/duff-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-C.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/warn-1.c  (test for warnings, line 8)
FAIL: gcc.dg/warn-1.c  (test for warnings, line 15)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-scanf-3.c vfscanf (test for warnings, line 21)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-scanf-3.c vfscanf (test for warnings, line 21)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/ext-6.c vfscanf (test for warnings, line 42)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/ext-6.c vfscanf (test for warnings, line 42)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/inline-1.c (test for excess errors)

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		22158
# of unexpected failures	15
# of expected failures		70
# of unresolved testcases	2
# of untested testcases		1
# of unsupported tests		92
/usr/home/ritzert/gcc-HEAD/obj/gcc/xgcc version 3.4 20030328 (experimental)

		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		1153
/usr/home/ritzert/gcc-HEAD/obj/gcc/xgcc version 3.4 20030328 (experimental)

		=== libjava tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: longfield output
FAIL: SyncGlobal -O execution - bytecode->native test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
FAIL: Thread_Sleep output - source compiled test
FAIL: Thread_Sleep output - bytecode->native test
FAIL: Thread_Sleep -O output - source compiled test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: Throw_2 -O execution - source compiled test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
FAIL: Throw_2 -O execution - bytecode->native test

		=== libjava Summary ===

# of expected passes		2949
# of unexpected failures	13
# of expected failures		16
# of untested testcases		21
		=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: 24_iterators/iterator.cc execution test

		=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===

# of expected passes		919
# of unexpected failures	1
# of expected failures		1

Compiler version: 3.4 20030328 (experimental) 
Platform: i386-unknown-freebsd4.7
configure flags: --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/home/ritzert/gcc-HEAD/install

Counting all warnings,
there are 28 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
   4 insn-conditions.c
   4 gcc/crtstuff.c
   4 gcc/ada/adaint.c
   2 op12040.c
   2 gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
   2 gcc/gcc.c
   2 gcc/f/sta.c
   2 c-p81477.c
   2 /usr/local/share/bison/bison.simple
   1 gcc/java/jvspec.c
   1 gcc/config/i386/i386.md
   1 gcc/ada/tracebak.c
   1 ada/b_gnatb.c

Number of warning types:
   9 string length `???' is greater than the length `???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
   6 traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions
   4 passing arg ??? of `???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
   2 tmpnam() possibly used unsafely; consider using mkstemp()
   2 mktemp() possibly used unsafely; consider using mkstemp()
   2 dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
   1 unused variable `???'
   1 operand 1 missing mode?
   1 comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false