Results for 3.1 20020112 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

Andris Pavenis andris@hal.astr.lu.lv
Sat Jan 12 20:35:00 GMT 2002


Last updated from CVS:  2002 Jan 13  04:04  +0200 

System:   Linux kernel 2.4.18-pre3
          glibc-2.2.3
          binutils-2.11.90.0.31

LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 13 02:04:14 UTC 2002

Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/other/deprecated.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate2.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 19)

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		6827
# of unexpected failures	2
# of expected failures		98
# of untested testcases		9
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.1 20020112 (experimental)

		=== g77 tests ===


Running target unix

		=== g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes		1360
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.1 20020112 (experimental)

		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c,  -O0  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c,  -O1  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c,  -O2  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c,  -O3 -g  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c,  -Os  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011223-1.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011223-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011223-1.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011223-1.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-10.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-10.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/i386-sse-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-scanf-1.c %hhu sign (test for warnings, line 144)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-strftime-1.c bad %O% (test for warnings, line 96)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-strftime-1.c (test for excess errors)

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		16923
# of unexpected failures	17
# of expected failures		47
# of unsupported tests		33
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20020112 (experimental)

		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution,  -O0 
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution,  -O1 
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution,  -O2 
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution,  -Os 

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		1036
# of unexpected failures	6
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20020112 (experimental)

		=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===


Running target unix
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_put_members_char.cc execution test
FAIL: 26_numerics/binary_closure.cc (test for excess errors)
XPASS: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc  (test for errors, line 35)
FAIL: 26_numerics/valarray.cc (test for excess errors)

		=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===

# of expected passes		336
# of unexpected failures	2
# of unexpected successes	3
# of expected failures		24

Compiler version: 3.1 20020112 (experimental) 
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=/disk2/gcc31 --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc --verbose --enable-threads=posix

Counting all warnings,
there are 54 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
     23	gcc/combine.c
     10	gcc/regclass.c
      6	gcc/cp/pt.c
      4	gcc/optabs.c
      4	gcc/gcc.c
      2	gcc/fold-const.c
      1	gcc/reload.c
      1	gcc/profile.c
      1	gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/function.c
      1	gcc/cp/lang-specs.h

Number of warning types:
     42	comparison between signed and unsigned
      6	string length `???' is greater than the length `???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      5	signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
      1	pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness



More information about the Gcc-testresults mailing list