Results for 3.1 20020110 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
Andris Pavenis
andris@hal.astr.lu.lv
Thu Jan 10 20:34:00 GMT 2002
Last updated from CVS: 2002 Jan 11 04:03 +0200
System: Linux kernel 2.4.17
glibc-2.2.3
binutils-2.11.90.0.31
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jan 11 02:03:50 UTC 2002
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/other/deprecated.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate2.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 19)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 6827
# of unexpected failures 2
# of expected failures 98
# of untested testcases 9
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.1 20020110 (experimental)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 1360
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.1 20020110 (experimental)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20020106-1.c, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011223-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011223-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011223-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011223-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/920302-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/920302-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/comp-goto-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/comp-goto-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-10.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-10.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-scanf-1.c %hhu sign (test for warnings, line 144)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 16913
# of unexpected failures 18
# of expected failures 47
# of unresolved testcases 4
# of unsupported tests 33
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20020110 (experimental)
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution, -O0
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution, -O1
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution, -O2
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution, -Os
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 1036
# of unexpected failures 6
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20020110 (experimental)
=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_put_members_char.cc execution test
FAIL: 26_numerics/binary_closure.cc (test for excess errors)
XPASS: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for errors, line 35)
FAIL: 26_numerics/valarray.cc (test for excess errors)
=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===
# of expected passes 336
# of unexpected failures 2
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 24
Compiler version: 3.1 20020110 (experimental)
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=/disk2/gcc31 --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc --verbose --enable-threads=posix
Counting all warnings,
there are 62 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
23 gcc/combine.c
10 gcc/regclass.c
6 gcc/cp/pt.c
4 gcc/optabs.c
4 gcc/gcc.c
3 gcc/diagnostic.c
2 gcc/fold-const.c
2 gcc/except.h
2 gcc/attribs.c
1 gcc/reload.c
1 gcc/profile.c
1 gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/function.c
1 gcc/expr.c
1 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
Number of warning types:
44 comparison between signed and unsigned
6 string length `???' is greater than the length `???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
4 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
4 assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
1 suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous `else'
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
1 its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
1 `???' declared inside parameter list
More information about the Gcc-testresults
mailing list