Results for 3.2 20020426 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-cygwin
Christian Jönsson
christian@j-son.org
Sat Apr 27 06:56:00 GMT 2002
This was on a Windows XP/cygwin P4 system with these packages:
binutils 2.11.92 20011001 (cygwin version 20011002-1)
cygwin 1.3.10-1
dejagnu 1.3.1 (cygwin version 20010117-1)
gcc 2.95.3-5
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Apr 27 03:57:49 2002
Native configuration is i686-pc-cygwin
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/instantiate3.C scan-assembler-not
FAIL: g++.dg/parse/stack1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/template/typename2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C (test for warnings, line 5)
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/initp1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/badalloc1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.ext/attrib5.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.jason/template18.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/template18.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.pt/ptrmem4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/ebnull-cast.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 7254
# of unexpected failures 12
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 87
# of untested testcases 15
# of unsupported tests 3
/usr/local/src/gcc-dev/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.2 20020426 (experimental)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g77.dg/bprob/bprob-1.f compilation, -O2 -fprofile-arcs
UNRESOLVED: g77.dg/bprob/bprob-1.f execution, -O2 -fprofile-arcs
UNRESOLVED: g77.dg/bprob/bprob-1.f compilation, -O2 -fbranch-probabilities
UNRESOLVED: g77.dg/bprob/bprob-1.f execution, -O2 -fbranch-probabilities
FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/20010519-1.f, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/auto0.f compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 1627
# of unexpected failures 11
# of unresolved testcases 3
# of untested testcases 1
/usr/local/src/gcc-dev/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.2 20020426 (experimental)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 1036
# of expected failures 6
/usr/local/src/gcc-dev/objdir/gcc/xgcc version 3.2 20020426 (experimental)
=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
Running target unix
ERROR: tcl error sourcing /usr/local/src/gcc-dev/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-v3.dg/dg.exp.
ERROR: couldn't compile regular expression pattern: nested *?+
=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===
Compiler version: 3.2 20020426 (experimental)
Platform: i686-pc-cygwin
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-cygwin --enable-threads=posix --enable-sjlj-exceptions --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --disable-shared
Counting all warnings,
there are 239 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
94 libiberty/md5.c
51 cc1plus.exe
27 include/i686-pc-cygwin/bits/gthr-default.h
10 libiberty/regex.c
10 cxa_demangle.c
8 dyn-string.c
6 include/libiberty.h
6 include/alloca.h
6 cc1.exe
4 libiberty/getopt.c
4 include/getopt.h
3 gcc/unwind-pe.h
2 libtool
2 libiberty/strsignal.c
1 libsupc++/eh_terminate.cc
1 libstdc++-v3/src/localename.cc
1 libf2c/libI77/open.c
1 include/xregex2.h
1 configure
1 config.h
Number of warning types:
53 -ffunction-sections may affect debugging on some targets
49 integer constant is unsigned in ANSI C, signed with -traditional
27 ignoring
16 implicit declaration of function \`???'
16 function-like macro \`FI' must be used with arguments in traditional C
16 function-like macro \`FH' must be used with arguments in traditional C
16 function-like macro \`FG' must be used with arguments in traditional C
7 this is the location of the previous definition
6 unused parameter \`???'
6 \`???' redefined
4 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
4 function declaration isn't a prototype
2 undefined symbols not allowed in i686-pc-cygwin shared libraries
2 ignoring command line option '-fno-implicit-templates'
2 control reaches end of non-void
2 comparison between signed and unsigned
2 (it is valid for C++ but not the selected language)
1 wchar_t support disabled.
1 traditional C rejects string concatenation
1 assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
1 \`noreturn'
1 \`_XOPEN_SOURCE' redefined
1 \`???' might be
1 \`???' defined but not used
1 \`
1 ISO C89 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
Counting all warnings,
there are 75 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
23 gcc/combine.c
10 gcc/regclass.c
9 gcc/gcc.c
4 gcc/optabs.c
4 gcc/java/lex.c
3 gcc/unroll.c
3 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
2 gcc/varasm.c
2 gcc/real.c
2 gcc/java/javaop.def
2 gcc/fold-const.c
1 gcc/unwind-pe.h
1 gcc/tree.c
1 gcc/sdbout.c
1 gcc/reload.c
1 gcc/java/jvspec.c
1 gcc/function.c
1 gcc/flow.c
1 gcc/f/where.c
1 gcc/emit-rtl.c
1 gcc/config/i386/i386.c
1 gcc/cfgrtl.c
Number of warning types:
41 comparison between signed and unsigned
7 string length \`???' is greater than the length \`???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
4 traditional C rejects string concatenation
4 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
4 \`???' defined but not used
3 \`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
2 operation on \`???' may be undefined
2 comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
2 comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
2 assignment of read-only location
1 unused variable \`???'
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of \`???' differ in signedness
1 function declaration isn't a prototype
1 assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
More information about the Gcc-testresults
mailing list