Results for 3.1 20011020 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Andris Pavenis]

Source:   gcc MAIN branch (last updated 2001 Oct 21  04:02  +0300)
System:   Linux kernel 2.4.10-ac12
          glibc-2.2.3
          binutils-2.11.90.0.31

LAST_UPDATED: Sun Oct 21 01:02:16 UTC 2001

Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/parse/saved1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.bob/static1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/operators32.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/enum5.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.pt/decl2.C ICE - (test for errors, line 8)
XPASS: g++.robertl/eb17.C  Execution test

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		6639
# of unexpected failures	4
# of unexpected successes	2
# of expected failures		95
# of untested testcases		9
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.1 20011020 (experimental)

		=== g77 tests ===


Running target unix

		=== g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes		1360
		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/990829-1.c,  -O2  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/990829-1.c,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/990829-1.c,  -O3 -g  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/990829-1.c,  -Os  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-1.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-1.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-1.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-1.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-1.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-2.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-2.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-2.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-2.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010904-2.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000724-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011015-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-scanf-1.c %hhu sign (test for warnings, line 144)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-scanf-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/ext-3.c bad %^# (test for warnings, line 215)

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		16061
# of unexpected failures	21
# of expected failures		71
# of unsupported tests		24
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20011020 (experimental)

		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/formal_protocol-6.m execution,  -O 
FAIL: objc.dg/method-2.m  (test for warnings, line 25)
FAIL: objc.dg/method-2.m  (test for warnings, line 25)

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		203
# of unexpected failures	3
/disk2/cvs/gcc31/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 3.1 20011020 (experimental)

		=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: 21_strings/ctor_copy_dtor.cc execution test
FAIL: 21_strings/insert.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/codecvt.cc (test for excess errors)
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_put_members_char.cc execution test

		=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===

# of expected passes		314
# of unexpected failures	3
# of unexpected successes	2
# of expected failures		27

Compiler version: 3.1 20011020 (experimental) 
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=/disk2/gcc31 --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc --verbose --enable-threads=posix

Counting all warnings,
there are 56 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
     23	gcc/combine.c
      6	gcc/cp/pt.c
      5	gcc/cse.c
      4	gcc/emit-rtl.c
      3	gcc/gcc.c
      2	gcc/tlink.c
      2	gcc/objc/objc-act.c
      2	gcc/fold-const.c
      1	insn-emit.c
      1	gcc/regmove.c
      1	gcc/profile.c
      1	gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/flow.c
      1	gcc/f/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/dwarf2out.c
      1	gcc/cp/lex.c
      1	gcc/cp/lang-specs.h

Number of warning types:
     38	comparison between signed and unsigned
      6	string length `???' is greater than the length `???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
      4	signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
      2	passing arg ??? of `???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
      1	unused variable `???'
      1	right shift count >= width of type
      1	pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
      1	missing initializer
      1	function declaration isn't a prototype
      1	(near initialization for `???')