Results for 3.0.3 20011113 (prerelease) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
Gordon Sadler
gbsadler1@lcisp.com
Sat Nov 3 14:52:00 GMT 2001
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Nov 13 08:48:17 UTC 2001
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 6512
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 103
# of untested testcases 9
/usr/local/src/build/gcc-3.0/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.0.3 20011113 (prerelease)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 949
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -Os
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution, -O0
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution, -O1
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution, -O2
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution, -O3 -g
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-4.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/ext-3.c bad %^# (test for warnings, line 215)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/ext-3.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/xopen-1.c multiple use of scanf argument (test for warnings, line 115)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/xopen-1.c (test for excess errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 15316
# of unexpected failures 9
# of unexpected successes 6
# of expected failures 77
# of unsupported tests 20
/usr/local/src/build/gcc-3.0/gcc/xgcc version 3.0.3 20011113 (prerelease)
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 153
# of expected failures 1
/usr/local/src/build/gcc-3.0/gcc/xgcc version 3.0.3 20011113 (prerelease)
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: N19990310_4 output from source compiled test
XPASS: N19990310_4 -O output from source compiled test
XPASS: stringconst output from bytecode->native test
XPASS: stringconst -O output from bytecode->native test
XPASS: stub compilation from source
XPASS: stub byte compilation
XPASS: stub compilation from bytecode
XPASS: stub -O compilation from source
XPASS: stub byte compilation
XPASS: stub -O compilation from bytecode
=== libjava Summary ===
# of expected passes 1676
# of unexpected successes 10
# of expected failures 14
# of untested testcases 16
=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
Running target unix
=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===
# of expected passes 247
# of expected failures 8
Compiler version: 3.0.3 20011113 (prerelease)
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --verbose --enable-threads=posix --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --disable-nls --enable-checking
BOOT_CFLAGS=-g -Os -march=i686
Counting all warnings,
there are 105 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
28 gcc/combine.c
10 gcc/reg-stack.c
6 gcc/cp/pt.c
5 gcc/cse.c
5 gcc/cp/error.c
5 gcc/cp/call.c
4 gcc/except.c
3 insn-emit.c
3 gcc/reload1.c
3 gcc/gcc.c
3 gcc/config/i386/i386.md
3 gcc/config/i386/i386.c
2 gcc/varasm.c
2 gcc/reload.c
2 gcc/function.c
2 gcc/fold-const.c
2 gcc/expr.c
2 gcc/alias.c
1 gcc/unwind-dw2.c
1 gcc/sched-deps.c
1 gcc/regmove.c
1 gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/java/jvspec.c
1 gcc/flow.c
1 gcc/final.c
1 gcc/f/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/expmed.c
1 gcc/dwarfout.c
1 gcc/dwarf2out.c
1 gcc/cp/typeck2.c
1 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/cp/init.c
1 gcc/cp/errfn.c
Number of warning types:
57 comparison between signed and unsigned
14 \`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
7 string length \`???' is greater than the length \`???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
7 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
5 unused variable \`???'
5 initialization from incompatible pointer type
2 passing arg ??? of \`???' from incompatible pointer type
2 destination missing a mode?
1 unused parameter \`???'
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of \`???' differ in signedness
1 passing arg ??? of \`???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
1 operand 0 missing mode?
1 function declaration isn't a prototype
1 ??? format, ??? arg (arg ???)
More information about the Gcc-testresults
mailing list