Results for 2.97 20010128 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
Andris Pavenis
andris@hal.astr.lu.lv
Sun Jan 28 17:18:00 GMT 2001
Source: gcc mainline from CVS (last updated 2001 Jan 29 01:03 +0200)
System: Linux kernel 2.4.0
glibc-2.2
binutils-2.10.1.0.2
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001226-1.c, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001212-1.c, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001212-1.c, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001212-1.c, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001212-1.c, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001212-1.c, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010113-1.c, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010113-1.c, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010113-1.c, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010113-1.c, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010113-1.c, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010113-1.c, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/991118-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/991118-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/bf64-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/bf64-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2b.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000724-1.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/20001117-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/sequence-pt-1.c sequence point warning (test for warnings, line 59)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c99-scanf-1.c %hhu sign (test for warnings, line 144)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for errors, line 111)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noncompile/920923-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/mg.c
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 14881
# of unexpected failures 44
# of expected failures 78
# of unsupported tests 21
/disk2/cvs/egcs-curr/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 2.97 20010128 (experimental)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 18)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.jason/2371.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/crash32.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/loop2.C caused compiler crash
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 6298
# of unexpected failures 5
# of expected failures 90
# of untested testcases 9
/disk2/cvs/egcs-curr/build/build.lnx/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 2.97 20010128 (experimental)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g77.f-torture/execute/20010116.f execution, -O0
XPASS: g77.f-torture/execute/20010116.f execution, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f execution, -Os
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 910
# of unexpected failures 1
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 6
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/fdecl.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/np-1.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/np-2.m compilation, -O
FAIL: objc/execute/protocol.m compilation, -O
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 46
# of unexpected failures 4
# of untested testcases 4
/disk2/cvs/egcs-curr/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 2.97 20010128 (experimental)
Compiler version: 2.97 20010128 (experimental)
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --enable-shared --verbose --with-new-abi --enable-libstdcxx-v3 --enable-threads=posix
Counting all warnings,
there are 618 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
153 gcc/genattrtab.c
88 gcc/genemit.c
53 gcc/genpeep.c
43 gcc/genoutput.c
43 gcc/genattr.c
33 gcc/genextract.c
31 gcc/toplev.c
28 gcc/combine.c
19 gcc/genrecog.c
17 gcc/genopinit.c
10 gcc/reg-stack.c
9 gcc/genflags.c
9 gcc/genconfig.c
8 gcc/tradcpp.c
6 gcc/gcc.c
6 gcc/cp/pt.c
5 gcc/gencodes.c
5 gcc/cse.c
5 gcc/cp/error.c
4 gcc/gengenrtl.c
3 gcc/reload1.c
3 gcc/dependence.c
3 gcc/config/i386/i386.c
2 insn-emit.c
2 hashtab.c
2 gcc/reload.c
2 gcc/objc/objc-act.c
2 gcc/function.c
2 gcc/fold-const.c
2 gcc/expr.c
2 gcc/cp/call.c
2 gcc/config/i386/i386.md
2 gcc/alias.c
1 gcc/ssa.c
1 gcc/sched-deps.c
1 gcc/regmove.c
1 gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/ggc-page.c
1 gcc/gencheck.c
1 gcc/final.c
1 gcc/f/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/expmed.c
1 gcc/dwarfout.c
1 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/cp/init.c
1 gcc/cp/errfn.c
1 gcc/c-lex.c
Number of warning types:
526 ISO C99 requires rest arguments to be used
57 comparison between signed and unsigned
7 `???' might be used uninitialized in this function
6 string length `???' is greater than the minimum length `???' ISO C89 is required to support
5 initialization from incompatible pointer type
4 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
3 unused variable `???'
2 passing arg ??? of `???' from incompatible pointer type
2 destination missing a mode?
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
1 passing arg ??? of `???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
1 integer constant is unsigned in ISO C, signed with -traditional
1 function-like macro `strcmp' must be used with arguments in traditional C
1 function declaration isn't a prototype
1 decimal constant is so large that it is unsigned
More information about the Gcc-testresults
mailing list