Results for 3.0.1 testsuite on hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20
rbrown64@csc.com.au
rbrown64@csc.com.au
Tue Aug 21 18:18:00 GMT 2001
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.dg/mangle1.C scan-assembler
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 22)
FAIL: g++.other/mangle3.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 6458
# of unexpected failures 17
# of expected failures 113
# of untested testcases 21
/devel/span/rdb/src/gcc-20010820.obj/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.0.1
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 933
# of unsupported tests 8
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010605-1.c, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010605-1.c, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010605-1.c, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010605-1.c, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010605-1.c, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20010605-1.c, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010119-1.c compilation, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010119-1.c compilation, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010119-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010119-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010119-1.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010119-1.c compilation, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010119-1.c compilation, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/strct-stdarg-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/strct-stdarg-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/strct-stdarg-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/strct-stdarg-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/strct-stdarg-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/strct-stdarg-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/strct-stdarg-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/strct-stdarg-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/asm-fs-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/asm-names.c (test for excess errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 15114
# of unexpected failures 36
# of expected failures 81
# of unresolved testcases 10
# of unsupported tests 57
/devel/span/rdb/src/gcc-20010820.obj/gcc/xgcc version 3.0.1
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 153
# of expected failures 1
/devel/span/rdb/src/gcc-20010820.obj/gcc/xgcc version 3.0.1
=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: 21_strings/capacity.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 22_locale/ctype_char_members.cc execution test
FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct.cc (test for excess errors)
XPASS: 26_numerics/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 26_numerics/complex_inserters_extractors.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: 27_io/filebuf.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/filebuf_members.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/ifstream_members.cc execution test
=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===
# of expected passes 235
# of unexpected failures 7
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 7
Compiler version: 3.0.1
Platform: hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20
configure flags: --host=hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 --with-gnu-as
Counting all warnings,
there are 191 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
27 gcc/combine.c
23 gcc/expr.c
14 gcc/config/pa/pa.c
11 gcc/recog.c
11 gcc/calls.c
10 gcc/reload.c
9 quadlib.c
9 gcc/reload1.c
7 gcc/varasm.c
6 gcc/function.c
6 gcc/cse.c
6 gcc/cp/pt.c
5 gcc/gcc.c
5 gcc/cp/error.c
5 gcc/cp/call.c
3 gcc/unwind-sjlj.c
3 gcc/libgcc2.c
3 gcc/dwarf2asm.c
2 gcc/regmove.c
2 gcc/fold-const.c
2 gcc/except.c
2 gcc/cp/class.c
2 gcc/alias.c
2 alloca.c
1 insn-output.c
1 gcc/unwind-pe.h
1 gcc/sched-deps.c
1 gcc/reorg.c
1 gcc/regclass.c
1 gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/jump.c
1 gcc/java/jvspec.c
1 gcc/intl/dcgettext.c
1 gcc/flow.c
1 gcc/final.c
1 gcc/f/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/expmed.c
1 gcc/cp/typeck2.c
1 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
1 gcc/cp/errfn.c
Number of warning types:
66 comparison between signed and unsigned
42 integer constant larger than the maximum value of an unsigned long int
22 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
14 \`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
9 no previous prototype for \`???'
8 function declaration isn't a prototype
6 unused parameter \`???'
6 string length \`???' is greater than the length \`???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
5 initialization from incompatible pointer type
4 ??? format, ??? arg (arg ???)
3 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of \`???' differ in signedness
2 unused variable \`???'
2 \`???' defined but not used
1 suggest not using #elif in traditional C
1 implicit declaration of function \`???'
More information about the Gcc-testresults
mailing list