Results for 2.96 20000908 (experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu

Andris Pavenis andris@hal.astr.lu.lv
Fri Sep 8 22:16:00 GMT 2000 

Source:   gcc mainline from CVS (last updated 2000 Sep 09  01:01  +0200)
System:   Linux kernel 2.4.0-test7
          glibc-2.1.3
          binutils-2.10.0.24
Addons:   libg++-2.8.1.3-20000816

Native configuration is i586-pc-linux-gnu

		=== libio tests ===


Running target unix

		=== libio Summary ===

# of expected passes		40
		=== libstdc++ tests ===


Running target unix

		=== libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		30
		=== libg++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: tBitString.cc compilation
FAIL: tRational.cc compilation
FAIL: tFix.cc compilation
FAIL: tInteger.cc compilation
FAIL: tString.cc compilation

		=== libg++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		57
# of unexpected failures	5
# of expected failures		10
		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000225-1.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000225-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000225-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000225-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000225-1.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000225-1.c execution,  -O3 -fssa 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000225-1.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000731-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-1.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-1.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-1.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000801-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20000818-1.c compilation,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960608-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960608-1.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960608-1.c execution,  -O3 -fssa 
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000503-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000609-1.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000614-1.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000614-2.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000724-1.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000807-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/991214-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-array-nonobj-1.c func [] arg (test for errors, line 26)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-array-nonobj-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format-va-1.c wrong type in format warning (test for bogus messages, line 11)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format-va-1.c format error (test for warnings, line 11)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noreturn-1.c this function should not get any warnings (test for bogus messages, line 52)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noreturn-1.c detect return from tail call (test for warnings, line 59)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noreturn-2.c noreturn does return (test for bogus messages, line 12)
FAIL: gcc.dg/return-type-2.c warning for falling off end of non-void function (test for bogus messages, line 24)
FAIL: gcc.dg/return-type-2.c warning for falling off end of non-void function (test for bogus messages, line 42)
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/mg.c

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		12669
# of unexpected failures	36
# of expected failures		78
# of unresolved testcases	1
# of unsupported tests		18
/disk2/cvs/egcs-curr/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 2.96 20000908 (experimental)

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 18)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.other/loop2.C caused compiler crash

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		6013
# of unexpected failures	3
# of expected failures		95
# of untested testcases		8
/disk2/cvs/egcs-curr/build/build.lnx/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 2.96 20000908 (experimental)

		=== g77 tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/20000629-1.f,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops  
FAIL: g77.f-torture/compile/20000629-1.f,  -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops  
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f execution,  -Os 

		=== g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes		980
# of unexpected failures	3
		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		44
/disk2/cvs/egcs-curr/build/build.lnx/gcc/xgcc version 2.96 20000908 (experimental)


Compiler version: 2.96 20000908 (experimental) 
Platform: i586-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=i586-pc-linux-gnu --enable-shared --with-gnu-ld --verbose

Counting all warnings,
there are 106 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
     33	../../egcs/gcc/combine.c
     17	../../egcs/gcc/expr.c
     10	../../egcs/gcc/reg-stack.c
     10	../../egcs/gcc/cse.c
      6	../../egcs/gcc/loop.c
      4	../../../egcs/gcc/java/jcf-reader.c
      2	../../egcs/gcc/reload.c
      2	../../egcs/gcc/libgcc2.c
      2	../../egcs/gcc/gcc.c
      2	../../egcs/gcc/function.c
      2	../../egcs/gcc/fold-const.c
      2	../../egcs/gcc/cpplex.c
      2	../../egcs/gcc/alias.c
      1	../../egcs/gcc/java/jvspec.c
      1	../../egcs/gcc/gcse.c
      1	../../egcs/gcc/final.c
      1	../../egcs/gcc/f/lang-specs.h
      1	../../egcs/gcc/expmed.c
      1	../../egcs/gcc/dwarfout.c
      1	../../egcs/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
      1	../../egcs/gcc/c-pragma.c
      1	../../egcs/gcc/c-lex.c
      1	../../../egcs/gcc/cp/semantics.c
      1	../../../egcs/gcc/cp/error.c
      1	../../../egcs/gcc/cp/errfn.c

Number of warning types:
     65	comparison between signed and unsigned
     11	`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
     10	signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
      4	string length `???' is greater than the minimum length `???' ISO C89 is required to support
      4	`???' defined but not used
      3	function declaration isn't a prototype
      2	unused parameter `???'
      2	traditional C rejects the 'u' suffix
      1	pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
      1	passing arg ??? of `???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
      1	no previous prototype for `???'
      1	function macro strcmp must be used with arguments in traditional C
      1	`???' declared `static' but never defined

More information about the Gcc-testresults mailing list