Results for 2.96 20000522 (experimental) testsuite on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu
Brad Lucier
lucier@popov.math.purdue.edu
Mon May 22 14:04:00 GMT 2000
Native configuration is alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libio tests ===
Running target unix
=== libio Summary ===
# of expected passes 40
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 30
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/991213-2.c, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930529-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930529-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930529-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930529-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/930529-1.c execution, -O3 -fssa
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -O0
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -O1
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -O2
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/compare2.c case 10 (test for bogus messages, line 29)
FAIL: gcc.dg/compare2.c case 12 (test for bogus messages, line 33)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp-tradpaste.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noreturn-1.c this function should not get any warnings (test for bogus messages, line 50)
FAIL: gcc.dg/noreturn-1.c detect return from tail call (test for warnings, line 57)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 11379
# of unexpected failures 11
# of unexpected successes 4
# of expected failures 30
# of unsupported tests 32
/export/u11/lucier/programs/egcs/objdir/gcc/xgcc version 2.96 20000522 (experimental)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.oliva/template7.C caused compiler crash
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 5837
# of unexpected failures 1
# of expected failures 92
# of untested testcases 18
/export/u11/lucier/programs/egcs/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 2.96 20000522 (experimental)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/20000503-1.f execution, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/20000503-1.f execution, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/20000503-1.f execution, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/20000503-1.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/20000503-1.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/20000503-1.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions -funroll-all-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/20000503-1.f execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/20000503-1.f execution, -O3 -fssa
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/20000503-1.f execution, -Os
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 949
# of unexpected failures 9
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 40
/export/u11/lucier/programs/egcs/objdir/gcc/xgcc version 2.96 20000522 (experimental)
Compiler version: 2.96 20000522 (experimental)
Platform: alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: --with-gcc-version-trigger=/export/u11/lucier/programs/egcs/gcc/version.c --host=alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu --prefix=/export/u10/egcs-test --norecursion
Counting all warnings,
there are 50 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
9 ../../gcc/simplify-rtx.c
4 ../../gcc/genopinit.c
3 ../../gcc/regrename.c
3 ../../gcc/gcc.c
3 ../../gcc/cpplex.c
2 ../../gcc/toplev.c
2 ../../gcc/ifcvt.c
2 ../../gcc/genattrtab.c
2 ../../gcc/genattr.c
2 ../../gcc/calls.c
2 ../../../gcc/f/fini.c
2 ../../../gcc/cp/class.c
1 ./parse.y
1 ../../gcc/optabs.c
1 ../../gcc/loop.c
1 ../../gcc/genrecog.c
1 ../../gcc/genpeep.c
1 ../../gcc/genemit.c
1 ../../gcc/gcse.c
1 ../../gcc/fold-const.c
1 ../../gcc/final.c
1 ../../gcc/combine.c
1 ../../gcc/bb-reorder.c
1 ../../../gcc/java/jcf-write.c
1 ../../../gcc/f/expr.c
1 ../../../gcc/cp/cfns.h
Number of warning types:
14 ANSI C forbids braced-groups within expressions
10 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
10 `???' might be used uninitialized in this function
4 comparison between signed and unsigned
2 trigraph ??/ ignored
2 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
2 passing arg ??? of `???' from incompatible pointer type
2 passing arg ??? of `???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
1 trigraph ??= ignored
1 implicit declaration of function `???'
1 empty body in an if-statement
1 Use of ANSI string concatenation
More information about the Gcc-testresults
mailing list