Results for 2.97 20001218 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Alexandre Oliva]

Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu

		=== binutils tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: strip

		=== binutils Summary ===

# of expected passes		25
# of unexpected failures	1
		=== g77 tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/short.f execution,  -Os 

		=== g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes		888
# of unexpected failures	1
		=== gas tests ===


Running target unix

		=== gas Summary ===

# of expected passes		78
		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -O0  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -O1  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -O2  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -O3 -g  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20001116-1.c,  -Os  
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-1.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-1.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-1.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-1.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960608-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/960608-1.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2b.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-7.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000503-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000724-1.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/20001117-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/sequence-pt-1.c sequence point warning (test for warnings, line 59)

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		13329
# of unexpected failures	24
# of expected failures		77
# of unsupported tests		21
/l/tmp/egcs/gcc/xgcc version 2.97 20001218 (experimental)

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.brendan/crash39.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 18)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.jason/2371.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/code-gen5.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/ctors12.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.law/cvt2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/eh2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/crash32.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/loop2.C caused compiler crash
FAIL: g++.pt/instantiate4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.pt/instantiate6.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.pt/repo1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.pt/repo2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.pt/repo3.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb39.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb44.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb66.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb91.C (test for excess errors)

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		6154
# of unexpected failures	19
# of expected failures		101
# of untested testcases		9
/l/tmp/egcs/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 2.97 20001218 (experimental)

		=== ld tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: cdtest
FAIL: cdtest with -Ur
FAIL: S-records with constructors

		=== ld Summary ===

# of expected passes		96
# of unexpected failures	3
# of expected failures		1
		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/fdecl.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/np-1.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/np-2.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/protocol.m compilation,  -O 

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		46
# of unexpected failures	4
# of untested testcases		4
/l/tmp/egcs/gcc/xgcc version 2.97 20001218 (experimental)


Compiler version: 2.97 20001218 (experimental) 
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu

BOOT_CFLAGS: -g -O9 -W -Wall

Counting all warnings,
there are 125 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
     28	gcc/combine.c
     19	gcc/expr.c
     12	gcc/config/i386/i386.c
     10	gcc/reg-stack.c
      5	gcc/loop.c
      5	gcc/cse.c
      5	gcc/cp/error.c
      4	gcc/reload.c
      4	gcc/java/lex.c
      3	gcc/gcc.c
      3	gcc/dwarf2out.c
      2	hashtab.c
      2	gcc/libgcc2.c
      2	gcc/java/jcf-io.c
      2	gcc/function.c
      2	gcc/fold-const.c
      2	gcc/cp/call.c
      2	gcc/alias.c
      1	gcc/sched-vis.c
      1	gcc/sched-deps.c
      1	gcc/reload1.c
      1	gcc/objc/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/java/jvspec.c
      1	gcc/java/jcf-parse.c
      1	gcc/f/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/final.c
      1	gcc/expmed.c
      1	gcc/dwarfout.c
      1	gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
      1	gcc/cp/errfn.c
      1	gcc/c-lex.c

Number of warning types:
     77	comparison between signed and unsigned
     10	`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
      7	string length `???' is greater than the minimum length `???' ISO C89 is required to support
      6	signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
      5	unused variable `???'
      5	passing arg ??? of `???' from incompatible pointer type
      5	initialization from incompatible pointer type
      3	function declaration isn't a prototype
      1	pointer targets in passing arg ??? of `???' differ in signedness
      1	passing arg ??? of `???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
      1	no previous prototype for `???'
      1	label `???' defined but not used
      1	integer constant is unsigned in ISO C, signed with -traditional
      1	function-like macro `strcmp' must be used with arguments in traditional C
      1	decimal constant is so large that it is unsigned