[PATCHSET] Reintroduce targetrustm hooks

[Richard Biener]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 10:14 PM Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Arthur Cohen's message of September 7, 2023 3:41 pm:
> > Alright, was not expecting to mess up this patchset so bad so here we go:
> >
> > This patchset reintroduces proper targetrustm hooks without the old
> > problematic mess of macros we had, which had been removed for the first
> > merge of gccrs upstream.
> >
> > Tested on x86-64 GNU Linux, and has also been present in our development
> > repository for a long time - added by this pull-request from Iain [1]
> > which was merged in October 2022.
> >
> > Ok for trunk?
> >
> > [PATCH 01/14] rust: Add skeleton support and documentation for
> > [PATCH 02/14] rust: Reintroduce TARGET_RUST_CPU_INFO hook
> > [PATCH 03/14] rust: Reintroduce TARGET_RUST_OS_INFO hook
> > [PATCH 04/14] rust: Implement TARGET_RUST_CPU_INFO for i[34567]86-*-*
> > [PATCH 05/14] rust: Implement TARGET_RUST_OS_INFO for *-*-darwin*
> > [PATCH 06/14] rust: Implement TARGET_RUST_OS_INFO for *-*-freebsd*
> > [PATCH 07/14] rust: Implement TARGET_RUST_OS_INFO for *-*-netbsd*
> > [PATCH 08/14] rust: Implement TARGET_RUST_OS_INFO for *-*-openbsd*
> > [PATCH 09/14] rust: Implement TARGET_RUST_OS_INFO for *-*-solaris2*.
> > [PATCH 10/14] rust: Implement TARGET_RUST_OS_INFO for *-*-dragonfly*
> > [PATCH 11/14] rust: Implement TARGET_RUST_OS_INFO for *-*-vxworks*
> > [PATCH 12/14] rust: Implement TARGET_RUST_OS_INFO for *-*-fuchsia*.
> > [PATCH 13/14] rust: Implement TARGET_RUST_OS_INFO for
> > [PATCH 14/14] rust: Implement TARGET_RUST_OS_INFO for *-*-*linux*.
> >
>
> Thanks for eventually getting round to this.
>
> As the co-author of this patch series, I'm not going to look at it.
>
> FWIW, these being Rust-specific target changes isolated to just
> Rust-specific files, you should have the automony to commit without
> needing any request for review - at least this is my understanding when
> have made D-specific target changes in the past that have not touched
> common back-end headers.
>
> I'll let someone else confirm and check over the shared parts touched by
> the patch however.

I confirm.  I briefly went over the shared parts and they look OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

> For reviewers, this is pretty much a mirror of the D front-end's CPU and
> OS-specific target hooks (D has built-in version identifiers, not
> built-in attributes, but both Rust and D are otherwise the same in the
> kind of information exposed by them).
>
> > [1]: https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs/pull/1543
> >
>
> The other GitHub pull request that added these is here.
>
> https://github.com/Rust-GCC/gccrs/pull/1596
>
> Regards,
> Iain.