[PATCH 1/2] diagnostics: add error_meta
David Malcolm
dmalcolm@redhat.com
Wed Sep 6 14:12:18 GMT 2023
On Wed, 2023-09-06 at 15:53 +0200, Arthur Cohen wrote:
> From: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
I guess I can review this patch :)
Needs a ChangeLog entry, so here's one:
gcc/ChangeLog
* diagnostic-core.h (error_meta): New decl.
* diagnostic.cc (error_meta): New.
Also, needs a signed-off-by, so here's one:
Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
OK for trunk with those added.
Thanks
Dave
>
> ---
> gcc/diagnostic-core.h | 3 +++
> gcc/diagnostic.cc | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/diagnostic-core.h b/gcc/diagnostic-core.h
> index 7334c79e8e6..c9e27fd2e6e 100644
> --- a/gcc/diagnostic-core.h
> +++ b/gcc/diagnostic-core.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ extern void error_n (location_t, unsigned
> HOST_WIDE_INT, const char *,
> extern void error_at (location_t, const char *, ...)
> ATTRIBUTE_GCC_DIAG(2,3);
> extern void error_at (rich_location *, const char *, ...)
> ATTRIBUTE_GCC_DIAG(2,3);
> +extern void error_meta (rich_location *, const diagnostic_metadata
> &,
> + const char *, ...)
> + ATTRIBUTE_GCC_DIAG(3,4);
> extern void fatal_error (location_t, const char *, ...)
> ATTRIBUTE_GCC_DIAG(2,3)
> ATTRIBUTE_NORETURN;
> /* Pass one of the OPT_W* from options.h as the second parameter.
> */
> diff --git a/gcc/diagnostic.cc b/gcc/diagnostic.cc
> index c523f215bae..65c0cfbf11a 100644
> --- a/gcc/diagnostic.cc
> +++ b/gcc/diagnostic.cc
> @@ -2108,6 +2108,21 @@ error_at (rich_location *richloc, const char
> *gmsgid, ...)
> va_end (ap);
> }
>
> +/* Same as above, but with metadata. */
> +
> +void
> +error_meta (rich_location *richloc, const diagnostic_metadata
> &metadata,
> + const char *gmsgid, ...)
> +{
> + gcc_assert (richloc);
> +
> + auto_diagnostic_group d;
> + va_list ap;
> + va_start (ap, gmsgid);
> + diagnostic_impl (richloc, &metadata, -1, gmsgid, &ap, DK_ERROR);
> + va_end (ap);
> +}
> +
> /* "Sorry, not implemented." Use for a language feature which is
> required by the relevant specification but not implemented by
> GCC.
> An object file will not be produced. */
More information about the Gcc-rust
mailing list