[committed 22/88] gccrs: fixed indentations in AST pretty expanded dump of trait

[arthur.cohen@embecosm.com]

From: Abdul Rafey <abdulrafeyq@gmail.com>

gcc/rust/ChangeLog:

	* ast/rust-ast-dump.cc (Dump::visit): removed extra indentations in trait ast dump

Signed-off-by: Abdul Rafey <abdulrafeyq@gmail.com>
---
 gcc/rust/ast/rust-ast-dump.cc | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/rust/ast/rust-ast-dump.cc b/gcc/rust/ast/rust-ast-dump.cc
index 77e04b972dc..58eb35ad1db 100644
--- a/gcc/rust/ast/rust-ast-dump.cc
+++ b/gcc/rust/ast/rust-ast-dump.cc
@@ -1072,8 +1072,6 @@ Dump::visit (TypeBoundWhereClauseItem &item)
 void
 Dump::visit (Method &method)
 {
-  // FIXME: Do we really need to dump the indentation here?
-  stream << indentation;
   visit (method.get_visibility ());
   stream << "fn " << method.get_method_name () << '(';
 
@@ -1326,7 +1324,7 @@ void
 Dump::visit (TraitItemFunc &item)
 {
   auto func = item.get_trait_function_decl ();
-  stream << indentation << "fn " << func.get_identifier () << '(';
+  stream << "fn " << func.get_identifier () << '(';
 
   visit_items_joined_by_separator (func.get_function_params ());
 
@@ -1340,9 +1338,6 @@ Dump::visit (TraitItemMethod &item)
 {
   auto method = item.get_trait_method_decl ();
 
-  // FIXME: Do we really need to dump the indentation here?
-  stream << indentation;
-
   // FIXME: Can we have visibility here?
   // emit_visibility (method.get_visibility ());
   stream << "fn " << method.get_identifier () << '(';
-- 
2.40.0