Regressions on master at commit r16-1613 vs commit r16-1610 on Linux/x86_64

Haochen Jiang haochenj@gnu-skx-1.sc.intel.com
Sun Jun 22 19:43:53 GMT 2025

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r16-1610 vs commit r16-1609 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r16-1620 vs commit r16-1619 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Regressions on master at commit r16-1613 vs commit r16-1610 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O -flto -save-temps

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r16-1610 vs commit r16-1609 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r16-1620 vs commit r16-1619 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list