Regressions on master at commit r14-8498 vs commit r14-8478 on Linux/x86_64

H.J. Lu hjl@gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com
Tue Jan 30 05:56:39 GMT 2024

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r14-8506-g4bdcc8b3bf239c vs commit r14-8484-g91b3da6f1135dc on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on native/master at commit r14-8628 vs commit r14-8507 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Regressions on master at commit r14-8498 vs commit r14-8478 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O -flto -save-temps

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r14-8506-g4bdcc8b3bf239c vs commit r14-8484-g91b3da6f1135dc on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on native/master at commit r14-8628 vs commit r14-8507 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list