Regressions on master at commit r11-7698 vs commit r11-7694 on Linux/x86_64

H.J. Lu hjl@sc.intel.com
Wed Mar 17 03:53:58 GMT 2021

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-7690 vs commit r11-7678 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9450 vs commit r10-9445 on Linux/i686
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O -flto -save-temps

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-7690 vs commit r11-7678 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9450 vs commit r10-9445 on Linux/i686
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list