Regressions on master at commit r11-7590 vs commit r11-7588 on Linux/x86_64

H.J. Lu hjl@sc.intel.com
Wed Mar 10 04:58:30 GMT 2021

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-7588 vs commit r11-7578 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9427 vs commit r10-9421 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O -flto -save-temps

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-7588 vs commit r11-7578 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9427 vs commit r10-9421 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list