Regressions on master at commit r11-6808 vs commit r11-6784 on Linux/i686

H.J. Lu hjl@sc.intel.com
Wed Jan 20 09:48:56 GMT 2021

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-6808 vs commit r11-6783 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on native/master at commit r11-6814 vs commit r11-6808 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-2.f90   -O   (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-2.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf-float.c scan-assembler 0x10.*DW_AT_byte_size

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-6808 vs commit r11-6783 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on native/master at commit r11-6814 vs commit r11-6808 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list