December 2021 Archives by subject

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Wed Dec 1 00:07:03 GMT 2021
Ending: Thu Dec 30 10:04:13 GMT 2021
Messages: 221

• [r12-5612 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr88531-1a.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64   Richard Sandiford
• [r12-5823 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype-bitfield1.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-5832 Regression] FAIL: g++.target/i386/pr100738-1.C -std=gnu++98 scan-assembler-times vblendvps[ \\t] 2 on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-5835 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c++/target-this-4.C execution test on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-5874 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/warn/string1.C (test for warnings, line 17) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-5926 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-routine_gang-loop.f90 -O at line 53 (test for warnings, line 28) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-5944 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr99531.c scan-assembler-not push on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-5960 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03 -Os execution test on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-6007 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header_a.H -std=c++2b (internal compiler error: tree check: expected none of template_decl, have template_decl in add_specializations, at cp/module.cc:12966) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-6022 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header_a.H -std=c++2b (internal compiler error: tree check: expected none of template_decl, have template_decl in add_specializations, at cp/module.cc:12968) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-6030 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-object-size-2.c execution test on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-6031 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/builtin-dynamic-object-size-2.c execution test on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-6061 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pr89230-1.c (test for bogus messages, line 21) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-6066 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header_a.H -std=c++2b (internal compiler error: tree check: expected none of template_decl, have template_decl in add_specializations, at cp/module.cc:12969) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r12-6113 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/extract_recip_1.f -O scan-tree-dump-times optimized "rdiv_expr" 1 on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to build after binutils: Error on ld output file name matching input file name   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] 403.gcc failed to build after binutils: Error on ld output file name matching input file name   Alan Modra
• [TCWG CI] 433.milc grew in size by 7% after glibc: Replace --enable-static-pie with --disable-default-pie   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] 433.milc grew in size by 7% after glibc: Replace --enable-static-pie with --disable-default-pie   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] 433.milc grew in size by 7% after glibc: Replace --enable-static-pie with --disable-default-pie   Adhemerval Zanella
• [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM:[.] PUGH_ReductionMinVal slowed down by 83% after gcc: Darwin: Future-proof and homogeneize detection of darwin versions   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] 436.cactusADM:[.] PUGH_ReductionMinVal slowed down by 83% after gcc: Darwin: Future-proof and homogeneize detection of darwin versions   Prathamesh Kulkarni
• [TCWG CI] 444.namd grew in size by 2% after gcc: [PR99531] Modify pseudo class cost calculation when processing move involving the pseudo and a hard register   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] 447.dealII slowed down by 3% after gcc: [PR99531] Modify pseudo class cost calculation when processing move involving the pseudo and a hard register   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] 459.GemsFDTD grew in size by 2% after gcc: Limit inlining functions called once   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] dct_chroma slowed down by 37% after gcc: tree-optimization/103759: Use sizetype everywhere for object sizes   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] 464.h264ref:[.] dct_chroma slowed down by 37% after gcc: tree-optimization/103759: Use sizetype everywhere for object sizes   Prathamesh Kulkarni
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: Automatic date update in version.in   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: Automatic date update in version.in   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: Error on ld output file name matching input file name   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: Fix an undefined behaviour in the BFD library's DWARF parser.   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: Fix an undefined behaviour in the BFD library's DWARF parser.   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: gdb/mi: rename mi_lookup to mi_cmd_lookup   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: gdb/mi: use std::map for MI commands in mi-cmds.c   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: gdb/mi: use std::map for MI commands in mi-cmds.c   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: gdb: Powerpc mark xfail in gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: gdb: Powerpc mark xfail in gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: gdb: Powerpc mark xfail in gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp   Carl Love
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: gdb: Powerpc mark xfail in gdb.base/catch-syscall.exp   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: gdbsupport: remove unnecessary `#ifndef IN_PROCESS_AGENT`   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: RISC-V: Added ld testcases for the medlow and medany code models.   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: RISC-V: Added ld testcases for the medlow and medany code models.   Jim Wilson
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: RISC-V: Added ld testcases for the medlow and medany code models.   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: x86: Adjust linker tests for --disable-separate-code   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: x86: Adjust linker tests for --disable-separate-code   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: XCOFF C_STSYM test failure on 32-bit host   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: XCOFF C_STSYM test failure on 32-bit host   Alan Modra
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by binutils: XCOFF C_STSYM test failure on 32-bit host   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: [PATCH] stddef.h: add support for musl typedef macro guards   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: [PATCH] stddef.h: add support for musl typedef macro guards   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Add -fipa-strict-aliasing   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Add -fipa-strict-aliasing   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Add new constant data structure.   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Add new constant data structure.   Michael Meissner
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Add new constant data structure.   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Adjust 'gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-*' [PR103576, PR103697]   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Adjust 'gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-*' [PR103576, PR103697]   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Adjust 'gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-*' [PR103576, PR103697]   Thomas Schwinge
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: c: Fix ICE on deferred pragma in unknown attribute arguments [PR103587]   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: c: Fix ICE on deferred pragma in unknown attribute arguments [PR103587]   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Daily bump.   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Daily bump.   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Drop the fpic multilib for powerpc*-vxworks*   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: For -foffload= suggest also 'disable' and 'default' [PR103644]   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: For -foffload= suggest also 'disable' and 'default' [PR103644]   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Fortran: fix checking of elemental functions of type CLASS   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Fortran: fix checking of elemental functions of type CLASS   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: libstdc++: Support old and new T_FMT for en_HK locale [PR103687]   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: libstdc++: Support old and new T_FMT for en_HK locale [PR103687]   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: pr103523: Check for PLUS/MINUS support   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: pr103523: Check for PLUS/MINUS support   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Preserve cpu specific CRTSTUFF_T_CFLAGS on powerpc-vxworks7   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: Preserve cpu specific CRTSTUFF_T_CFLAGS on powerpc-vxworks7   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: tree-object-size: Use trees and support negative offsets   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: VxWorks config fixes for shared objects   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: VxWorks config fixes for shared objects   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by gcc: VxWorks config fixes for shared objects   Frédéric Konrad
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by newlib: Cygwin: pty: Fix conditions for input transfer.   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by newlib: Cygwin: pty: Fix conditions for input transfer again.   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by newlib: Cygwin: pty: Fix input switching failure.   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by newlib: Cygwin: pty: Fix input switching failure.   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by newlib: Cygwin: Use AS_HELP_STRING for --enable-debugging   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by newlib: README: configure.in -> configure.ac   ci_notify@linaro.org
• [TCWG CI] Regression caused by newlib: README: configure.in -> configure.ac   Maxim Kuvyrkov
• Idk how to use this   Katrina MacGregor
• native/master branch: commit r12-5775 failed to bootstrap on Linux/x86_64 (commit r12-5771 builds)!   H. J. Lu
• native/releases/gcc-11 branch: commit r11-9381 failed to bootstrap on Linux/x86_64 (commit r11-9379 builds)!   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5633 vs commit r12-5629 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5648 vs commit r12-5633 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5688 vs commit r12-5648 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5698 vs commit r12-5688 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5702 vs commit r12-5698 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5705 vs commit r12-5648 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5758 vs commit r12-5714 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5762 vs commit r12-5758 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5771 vs commit r12-5762 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5778 vs commit r12-5771 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5797 vs commit r12-5793 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5804 vs commit r12-5797 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5811 vs commit r12-5804 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5816 vs commit r12-5811 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5824 vs commit r12-5816 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5824 vs commit r12-5816 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5830 vs commit r12-5826 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5830 vs commit r12-5826 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5835 vs commit r12-5830 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5835 vs commit r12-5830 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5850 vs commit r12-5844 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5853 vs commit r12-5831 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5853 vs commit r12-5831 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5870 vs commit r12-5854 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5870 vs commit r12-5854 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5883 vs commit r12-5870 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5883 vs commit r12-5870 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5886 vs commit r12-5853 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5887 vs commit r12-5853 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5897 vs commit r12-5883 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5897 vs commit r12-5883 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5901 vs commit r12-5897 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5901 vs commit r12-5897 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5905 vs commit r12-5886 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5905 vs commit r12-5901 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5906 vs commit r12-5887 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5910 vs commit r12-5908 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5914 vs commit r12-5910 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5931 vs commit r12-5919 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5931 vs commit r12-5919 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5944 vs commit r12-5931 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5945 vs commit r12-5919 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5945 vs commit r12-5919 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5953 vs commit r12-5944 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5953 vs commit r12-5944 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5966 vs commit r12-5953 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5966 vs commit r12-5953 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5982 vs commit r12-5945 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5982 vs commit r12-5966 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-5984 vs commit r12-5945 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6003 vs commit r12-6000 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6009 vs commit r12-6003 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6009 vs commit r12-6003 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6010 vs commit r12-5982 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6011 vs commit r12-5984 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6022 vs commit r12-6015 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6022 vs commit r12-6015 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6029 vs commit r12-6010 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6031 vs commit r12-6011 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6041 vs commit r12-6022 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6041 vs commit r12-6022 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6053 vs commit r12-6029 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6058 vs commit r12-6053 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6058 vs commit r12-6053 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6060 vs commit r12-6053 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6060 vs commit r12-6053 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6061 vs commit r12-6059 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6061 vs commit r12-6059 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6070 vs commit r12-6064 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6070 vs commit r12-6064 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6071 vs commit r12-6060 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6071 vs commit r12-6060 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6075 vs commit r12-6070 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6079 vs commit r12-6075 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6083 vs commit r12-6071 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6108 vs commit r12-6102 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6112 vs commit r12-6106 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6113 vs commit r12-6112 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6114 vs commit r12-6108 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6123 vs commit r12-6118 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6127 vs commit r12-6119 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6148 vs commit r12-6140 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r12-6148 vs commit r12-6144 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5771 vs commit r12-5761 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5778 vs commit r12-5771 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5824 vs commit r12-5818 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5829 vs commit r12-5826 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5835 vs commit r12-5831 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5868 vs commit r12-5857 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5872 vs commit r12-5868 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5882 vs commit r12-5872 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5897 vs commit r12-5886 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5899 vs commit r12-5897 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5931 vs commit r12-5918 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5944 vs commit r12-5936 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5953 vs commit r12-5944 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-5966 vs commit r12-5953 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6008 vs commit r12-6004 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6023 vs commit r12-6020 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6041 vs commit r12-6023 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6058 vs commit r12-6052 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6062 vs commit r12-6059 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6066 vs commit r12-6063 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6068 vs commit r12-6066 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6078 vs commit r12-6075 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6112 vs commit r12-6106 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6113 vs commit r12-6112 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6123 vs commit r12-6118 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r12-6148 vs commit r12-6146 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-10324 vs commit r10-10314 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-10336 vs commit r10-10324 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-10352 vs commit r10-10336 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9364 vs commit r11-9360 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9393 vs commit r11-9383 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9398 vs commit r11-9393 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-10324 vs commit r10-10314 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-10336 vs commit r10-10324 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-10352 vs commit r10-10336 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9364 vs commit r11-9360 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9364 vs commit r11-9360 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9375 vs commit r11-9354 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9375 vs commit r11-9354 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9375 vs commit r11-9371 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9377 vs commit r11-9375 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9383 vs commit r11-9377 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9393 vs commit r11-9383 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9393 vs commit r11-9383 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9398 vs commit r11-9393 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9398 vs commit r11-9393 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9399 vs commit r11-9375 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9399 vs commit r11-9375 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-11 at commit r11-9420 vs commit r11-9407 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• releases/gcc-11 branch: commit r11-9381 failed to bootstrap on Linux/i686 (commit r11-9379 builds)!   H.J. Lu
• releases/gcc-11 branch: commit r11-9381 failed to bootstrap on Linux/x86_64 (commit r11-9377 builds)!   H.J. Lu

Last message date: Thu Dec 30 10:04:13 GMT 2021
Archived on: Thu Dec 30 10:04:19 GMT 2021

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...