Regressions on master at commit r11-3249 vs commit r11-3215 on Linux/x86_64

H.J. Lu hjl@sc.intel.com
Thu Sep 17 08:18:19 GMT 2020


New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1.c execution,    -g -DFOR_AUTOFDO_TESTING
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr66295.c execution,    -g -DFOR_AUTOFDO_TESTING
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/prof-robust-1.c execution,    -g -DFOR_AUTOFDO_TESTING
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/stringop-2.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "[0-9]+ >= 0;" 6
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/stringop-2.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "= [xy]_[0-9]+\\(D\\) \\^ [xy]_[0-9]+\\(D\\);" 6
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/switch-case-1.c execution,    -g -DFOR_AUTOFDO_TESTING
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/devirt.C execution,    -g -DFOR_AUTOFDO_TESTING

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-3.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/cmpsf-1.c execution,    -g -DFOR_AUTOFDO_TESTING
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-10.c scan-tree-dump-times vrp1 " >> 2" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-10.c scan-tree-dump-times vrp1 " >> 2" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-10.c scan-tree-dump-times vrp1 " >> 2" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-10.c scan-tree-dump-times vrp1 " & 3" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-10.c scan-tree-dump-times vrp1 " & 3" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030807-10.c scan-tree-dump-times vrp1 " & 3" 1
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/indir-call-prof.C execution,    -g -DFOR_AUTOFDO_TESTING
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/pr35545.C execution,    -g -DFOR_AUTOFDO_TESTING
FAIL: mtest_minidebug


More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list