[r11-4134 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/Walloca-1.c (test for warnings, line 27) on Linux/x86_64

Jeff Law law@redhat.com
Wed Oct 21 00:45:48 GMT 2020


On 10/20/20 5:13 PM, sunil.k.pandey via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Linux/x86_64,
>
> 495ec0b2aa808a6463b8c24288a1730cbae1cfca is the first bad commit
> commit 495ec0b2aa808a6463b8c24288a1730cbae1cfca
> Author: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
> Date:   Mon Oct 19 16:52:51 2020 +0200
>
>     Convert -Walloca pass to ranger.
>
> caused
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/Walloca-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/Walloca-1.c  (test for warnings, line 27)
>
> with GCC configured with
>
> Configured with: ../../gcc/configure --prefix=/local/skpandey/gccwork/toolwork/gcc-bisect-master/master/r11-4134/usr --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl --enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
>
> To reproduce:
>
> $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/Walloca-1.c --target_board='unix{-m32}'"
> $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/Walloca-1.c --target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'"
>
> (Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me at skpgkp2 at gmail dot com)

My tester is flagging this too on the embedded targets.  visium-elf for
example.


Jef



More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list