[r11-3641 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pta-ptrarith-1.c -Os scan-tree-dump alias "ESCAPED = {[^\n}]* i f [^\n}]*}" on Linux/x86_64 (-m32 -march=cascadelake)

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Sun Oct 4 17:39:14 GMT 2020


On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 10:33 AM Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/4/20 10:51 AM, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 5:57 PM Segher Boessenkool
> > <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 12:21:04PM -0700, sunil.k.pandey via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >>> On Linux/x86_64,
> >>>
> >>> c34db4b6f8a5d80367c709309f9b00cb32630054 is the first bad commit
> >>> commit c34db4b6f8a5d80367c709309f9b00cb32630054
> >>> Author: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
> >>> Date:   Sat Oct 3 17:20:16 2020 +0200
> >>>
> >>>      Track access ranges in ipa-modref
> >>>
> >>> caused
> >>
> >> [ ... ]
> >>
> >> This isn't a patch.  Wrong mailing list?
> >
> > I view this as a follow up of
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/555314.html
> >
> > What do people think about this kind of followups?  Is this appropriate
> > for this mailing list?
>
> A number of people routinely send emails similar to these to this
> list to point out regressions on their targets.  I find both kinds
> of emails very useful and don't mind the additional traffic.
>
> What would be an improvement is sending just one email for all
> the testsuite regressions rather than one for each test or run
> as seems to be happening.

Sunil, can you update your script to send out a single email
for all regressions caused by one commit?  Thanks.

> I'm not sure that automatically opening bugs instead would be
> better, certainly not one per test, and not if the code author
> wasn't also CC'd if not automatically assigned to it.
>
> Martin



-- 
H.J.


More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list