November 2020 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Nov 2 13:36:21 GMT 2020
Ending: Mon Nov 30 23:51:14 GMT 2020
Messages: 262

• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4597 vs commit r11-4584 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4597 vs commit r11-4582 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4597 vs commit r11-4582 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4611 vs commit r11-4597 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4628 vs commit r11-4611 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4628 vs commit r11-4609 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4668 vs commit r11-4628 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4669 vs commit r11-4633 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4668 vs commit r11-4628 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• [r11-4614 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-fortran/multidim-slice.f95 -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 -foffload=disable -O3 -g execution test on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r11-4664 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-4.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 22 y == 68 on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4702 vs commit r11-4585 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4704 vs commit r11-4585 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4722 vs commit r11-4697 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4722 vs commit r11-4668 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4739 vs commit r11-4724 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4739 vs commit r11-4724 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4739 vs commit r11-4724 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• [r11-4733 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-4.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 y == 25 on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
  • [r11-4733 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr54519-4.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line 17 y == 25 on Linux/x86_64   Richard Biener
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4761 vs commit r11-4753 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4763 vs commit r11-4702 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4765 vs commit r11-4704 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4787 vs commit r11-4759 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• [r11-4770 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/modref-2.c scan-ipa-dump modref "Parm 1 param offset:0 offset:0 size:-1 max_size:64" on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4788 vs commit r11-4761 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4788 vs commit r11-4761 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4801 vs commit r11-4792 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4806 vs commit r11-4801 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4801 vs commit r11-4788 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-8991 vs commit r10-8971 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-8991 vs commit r10-8984 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-8991 vs commit r10-8984 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4812 vs commit r11-4763 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4812 vs commit r11-4765 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-8991 vs commit r10-8957 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-8991 vs commit r10-8957 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4819 vs commit r11-4806 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• [r11-4813 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/Wimplicit-fallthrough-20.c -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line 36) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
  • [r11-4813 Regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/Wimplicit-fallthrough-20.c -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line 36) on Linux/x86_64   Marek Polacek
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4818 vs commit r11-4811 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4818 vs commit r11-4811 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4820 vs commit r11-4818 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4820 vs commit r11-4818 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4822 vs commit r11-4812 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9031 vs commit r9-9011 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9031 vs commit r9-9011 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4825 vs commit r11-4819 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9032 vs commit r9-9012 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9032 vs commit r9-9012 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9032 vs commit r9-9012 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4826 vs commit r11-4822 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• releases/gcc-10 branch: commit r10-8995 failed to bootstrap on Linux/x86_64 (commit r10-8991 builds)!   H.J. Lu
• releases/gcc-10 branch: commit r10-8995 failed to bootstrap on Linux/i686 (commit r10-8991 builds)!   H.J. Lu
• native/releases/gcc-10 branch: commit r10-8995 failed to bootstrap on Linux/x86_64 (commit r10-8991 builds)!   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4839 vs commit r11-4825 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4839 vs commit r11-4825 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4849 vs commit r11-4847 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4854 vs commit r11-4849 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4849 vs commit r11-4839 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4849 vs commit r11-4839 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• [r11-4852 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/ubsan/pr61272.C (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
  • [r11-4852 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/ubsan/pr61272.C (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64   Martin Liška
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4861 vs commit r11-4849 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4861 vs commit r11-4849 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4863 vs commit r11-4826 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4863 vs commit r11-4827 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• releases/gcc-10 branch: commit r10-8998 failed to bootstrap on Linux/x86_64 (commit r10-8991 builds)!   H.J. Lu
• releases/gcc-10 branch: commit r10-8998 failed to bootstrap on Linux/i686 (commit r10-8991 builds)!   H.J. Lu
• native/releases/gcc-10 branch: commit r10-8998 failed to bootstrap on Linux/x86_64 (commit r10-8991 builds)!   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4885 vs commit r11-4881 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• [r11-4883 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/workshare-reduction-57.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times optimized "__builtin_GOMP_loop_dynamic_next " 1 on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4891 vs commit r11-4885 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4886 vs commit r11-4877 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4886 vs commit r11-4877 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4897 vs commit r11-4891 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4898 vs commit r11-4863 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4901 vs commit r11-4863 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4919 vs commit r11-4897 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4922 vs commit r11-4919 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4919 vs commit r11-4897 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4919 vs commit r11-4897 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• [r11-4913 Regression] FAIL: 25_algorithms/merge/constrained.cc (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r11-4903 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/workshare-reduction-57.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times optimized "__builtin_GOMP_loop(?:_ull)_dynamic_next " 1 on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4924 vs commit r11-4919 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4924 vs commit r11-4919 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4929 vs commit r11-4924 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4932 vs commit r11-4898 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4932 vs commit r11-4901 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4945 vs commit r11-4929 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4945 vs commit r11-4929 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4948 vs commit r11-4946 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4951 vs commit r11-4948 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4951 vs commit r11-4945 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4961 vs commit r11-4957 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4961 vs commit r11-4951 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4961 vs commit r11-4951 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• [r11-4958 Regression] FAIL: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc execution test on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9020 vs commit r10-9012 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9020 vs commit r10-9012 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• [r10-9014 Regression] FAIL: std/ranges/iota/96042.cc (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9020 vs commit r10-9012 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4962 vs commit r11-4932 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4962 vs commit r11-4932 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4984 vs commit r11-4961 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-4982 vs commit r11-4961 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5003 vs commit r11-4995 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5008 vs commit r11-4982 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5008 vs commit r11-4982 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5019 vs commit r11-5010 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5023 vs commit r11-5008 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5023 vs commit r11-5008 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9025 vs commit r10-9020 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9025 vs commit r10-9020 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9025 vs commit r10-9020 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5025 vs commit r11-4962 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5027 vs commit r11-4962 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9025 vs commit r10-8991 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5030 vs commit r11-5024 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• [r11-5029 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr59776.c -Os -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION line pr59776.c:20 s2.f == 5.0 on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5030 vs commit r11-5023 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5030 vs commit r11-5023 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5032 vs commit r11-5025 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5032 vs commit r11-5027 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9047 vs commit r9-9031 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9048 vs commit r9-9032 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5045 vs commit r11-5032 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5046 vs commit r11-5032 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5059 vs commit r11-5040 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5059 vs commit r11-5040 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5059 vs commit r11-5040 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5061 vs commit r11-5060 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5065 vs commit r11-5061 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5062 vs commit r11-5059 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5062 vs commit r11-5059 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5071 vs commit r11-5062 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5071 vs commit r11-5062 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9033 vs commit r10-9028 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5073 vs commit r11-5045 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5074 vs commit r11-5046 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5093 vs commit r11-5071 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5103 vs commit r11-5093 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5092 vs commit r11-5071 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5092 vs commit r11-5071 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• [r11-5094 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr8081.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
  • [r11-5094 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr8081.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64   Jan Hubicka
    • [r11-5094 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr8081.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64   Jeff Law
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5105 vs commit r11-5103 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5105 vs commit r11-5092 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5105 vs commit r11-5092 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5113 vs commit r11-5109 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5115 vs commit r11-5105 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5115 vs commit r11-5105 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9039 vs commit r10-9033 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5116 vs commit r11-5073 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5117 vs commit r11-5074 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9051 vs commit r10-9039 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9052 vs commit r10-9051 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9052 vs commit r10-9051 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5168 vs commit r11-5152 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5168 vs commit r11-5153 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5168 vs commit r11-5153 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5182 vs commit r11-5177 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5181 vs commit r11-5168 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5181 vs commit r11-5168 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• [r11-5181 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-35.c scan-tree-dump vect "can't determine dependence between" on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5184 vs commit r11-5182 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5187 vs commit r11-5184 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• [r11-5185 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr97515.c scan-tree-dump-times evrp "goto" 1 on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
  • FAIL: gcc.dg/pr97515.c   Andrew MacLeod
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5187 vs commit r11-5181 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5187 vs commit r11-5181 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5187 vs commit r11-5153 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5187 vs commit r11-5154 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5200 vs commit r11-5187 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• [r11-5191 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr97873-1.c scan-assembler pabsq on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5206 vs commit r11-5200 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5207 vs commit r11-5200 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5207 vs commit r11-5200 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5219 vs commit r11-5207 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9059 vs commit r10-9052 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9059 vs commit r10-9052 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5219 vs commit r11-5187 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9059 vs commit r10-9025 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5224 vs commit r11-5219 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5224 vs commit r11-5214 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5227 vs commit r11-5224 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5227 vs commit r11-5224 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5227 vs commit r11-5224 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5235 vs commit r11-5227 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5235 vs commit r11-5219 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5235 vs commit r11-5227 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9061 vs commit r9-9047 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5238 vs commit r11-5235 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5238 vs commit r11-5235 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5241 vs commit r11-5238 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5250 vs commit r11-5241 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5256 vs commit r11-5250 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5249 vs commit r11-5241 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5263 vs commit r11-5256 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5263 vs commit r11-5249 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5267 vs commit r11-5261 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5268 vs commit r11-5263 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• [r11-5267 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/declare-target-4.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original "[\n\r][\n\r]f1" 1 on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5269 vs commit r11-5187 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5270 vs commit r11-5242 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9067 vs commit r10-9059 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5267 vs commit r11-5263 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5312 vs commit r11-5267 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5312 vs commit r11-5268 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5312 vs commit r11-5267 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5322 vs commit r11-5312 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5322 vs commit r11-5312 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5325 vs commit r11-5312 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5326 vs commit r11-5322 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9072 vs commit r10-9067 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• [r11-5324 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c note (test for warnings, line 29) on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• [r11-5310 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline "hooray[^\\n]*inline copy in test" on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9072 vs commit r10-9067 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• [r10-9070 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr97060.c scan-assembler-times DW_AT_declaration 2 on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9072 vs commit r10-9067 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5326 vs commit r11-5269 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5326 vs commit r11-5270 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5365 vs commit r11-5325 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5379 vs commit r11-5365 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5386 vs commit r11-5379 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5392 vs commit r11-5386 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• [r11-5391 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vxorpd-2.c execution test on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
  • [r11-5391 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vxorpd-2.c execution test on Linux/x86_64   Hongtao Liu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5393 vs commit r11-5392 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5394 vs commit r11-5389 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5394 vs commit r11-5389 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9085 vs commit r10-9072 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5396 vs commit r11-5326 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5396 vs commit r11-5326 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5441 vs commit r11-5396 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5441 vs commit r11-5394 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• [r11-5398 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr96906-1.c scan-assembler-times \tvpminuw[^\n\r]*ymm 2 on Linux/x86_64   sunil.k.pandey
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5451 vs commit r11-5441 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5456 vs commit r11-5396 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5499 vs commit r11-5455 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5508 vs commit r11-5499 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5508 vs commit r11-5499 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5508 vs commit r11-5499 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5509 vs commit r11-5456 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5509 vs commit r11-5456 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9091 vs commit r10-9059 on Linux/i686   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9091 vs commit r10-9059 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5511 vs commit r11-5508 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5514 vs commit r11-5511 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5515 vs commit r11-5509 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9079 vs commit r9-9061 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5517 vs commit r11-5514 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5520 vs commit r11-5518 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5526 vs commit r11-5520 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5529 vs commit r11-5526 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5529 vs commit r11-5520 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9080 vs commit r9-9062 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5529 vs commit r11-5515 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5572 vs commit r11-5529 on Linux/x86_64   H. J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5571 vs commit r11-5529 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu
• Regressions on master at commit r11-5582 vs commit r11-5571 on Linux/x86_64   H.J. Lu

Last message date: Mon Nov 30 23:51:14 GMT 2020
Archived on: Mon Nov 30 23:51:18 GMT 2020

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...