Regressions on master at commit r11-5451 vs commit r11-5441 on Linux/x86_64

H.J. Lu hjl@sc.intel.com
Thu Nov 26 23:51:53 GMT 2020

Previous message (by thread): [r11-5398 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr96906-1.c scan-assembler-times \tvpminuw[^\n\r]*ymm 2 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-5456 vs commit r11-5396 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O -flto -save-temps

Previous message (by thread): [r11-5398 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr96906-1.c scan-assembler-times \tvpminuw[^\n\r]*ymm 2 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on master at commit r11-5456 vs commit r11-5396 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list