Regressions on master at commit r11-4982 vs commit r11-4961 on Linux/x86_64

H.J. Lu hjl@sc.intel.com
Fri Nov 13 18:48:32 GMT 2020

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4984 vs commit r11-4961 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5003 vs commit r11-4995 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: 30_threads/future/members/poll.cc execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O -flto -save-temps

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on native/master at commit r11-4984 vs commit r11-4961 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on native/master at commit r11-5003 vs commit r11-4995 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list