Regressions on master at commit r11-6356 vs commit r11-6350 on Linux/x86_64

H.J. Lu hjl@sc.intel.com
Tue Dec 29 09:29:16 GMT 2020

Previous message (by thread): [r11-6351 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr92658-avx512bw-2.c scan-assembler-times pmovsxwq 2 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on native/master at commit r11-6365 vs commit r11-6364 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:

New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O -flto -save-temps

Previous message (by thread): [r11-6351 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr92658-avx512bw-2.c scan-assembler-times pmovsxwq 2 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on native/master at commit r11-6365 vs commit r11-6364 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list