Regressions on master at commit r11-6271 vs commit r11-6269 on Linux/x86_64

H.J. Lu hjl@sc.intel.com
Sun Dec 20 02:00:30 GMT 2020

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9159 vs commit r10-9147 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9122 vs commit r9-9111 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link,  -O -flto -save-temps

New passes:

Previous message (by thread): Regressions on releases/gcc-10 at commit r10-9159 vs commit r10-9147 on Linux/x86_64
Next message (by thread): Regressions on releases/gcc-9 at commit r9-9122 vs commit r9-9111 on Linux/x86_64
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-regression mailing list